Biblical Hebrew Forum

[Peter Kirk <peter AT qaya.org>]

On 23/11/2005 14:07, B. M. Rocine wrote:

> ...
>
> It doesn't matter to me if you want to keep 2:4a together with 2:4b. 
> 2:4b still grammatically depends on what follows, not what precedes.
>  

No, not if 2:4b is an expansion and explanation of behibbar'am at the 
end of 2:4a. This is at least possible, although I am not saying that I 
prefer it.

--
Peter Kirk
peter AT qaya.org (personal)
peterkirk AT qaya.org (work)
http://www.qaya.org/