b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum
List archive
- From: "Peter Kirk" <Peter_Kirk AT sil.org>
- To: "'Ian Hutchesson'" <mc2499 AT mclink.it>, "'Biblical Hebrew'" <b-hebrew AT franklin.metalab.unc.edu>
- Subject: RE: bereshit
- Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2002 10:20:03 -0000
No, your method here is fundamentally flawed. It is a simple linguistic
error to hold that a word or phrase can be understood apart from its
context and that putting it into context is secondary.
I have always accepted your reading as a possible one, but consider that
my one is preferable on the balance of probabilities. I was never
arguing more than that, and hoping that you would recognise that my
reading is also a possible one.
Peter Kirk
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ian Hutchesson [mailto:mc2499 AT mclink.it]
> Sent: 15 March 2002 10:10
> To: Biblical Hebrew
> Subject: Re: bereshit
>
<snip>
>
> >If verse 1 is not a separate unit, it
> >can only be understood in its context, which is what I was
discussing.
>
> One works from the data first, then puts it in context.
>
<snip>
-
RE: bereshit
, (continued)
- RE: bereshit, Peter Kirk, 03/13/2002
- Re: bereshit, Ian Hutchesson, 03/13/2002
- Re: bereshit, Ian Hutchesson, 03/14/2002
- RE: bereshit, Peter Kirk, 03/14/2002
- Re: bereshit, Ian Hutchesson, 03/14/2002
- RE: bereshit, Peter Kirk, 03/14/2002
- Re: bereshit, Lawrence May, 03/14/2002
- Re: bereshit, Ian Hutchesson, 03/14/2002
- RE: bereshit, Peter Kirk, 03/15/2002
- Re: bereshit, Ian Hutchesson, 03/15/2002
- RE: bereshit, Peter Kirk, 03/15/2002
- Re: bereshit, Ian Hutchesson, 03/15/2002
- Re: bereshit, Ian Hutchesson, 03/15/2002
- RE: bereshit, Peter Kirk, 03/15/2002
- RE: bereshit, Peter Kirk, 03/15/2002
- Re: bereshit, Christian M. M. Brady, 03/15/2002
- Re: bereshit, Ian Hutchesson, 03/16/2002
- Re: bereshit, Charles David Isbell, 03/16/2002
- RE: bereshit, Peter Kirk, 03/16/2002
- Re: bereshit, Ian Hutchesson, 03/17/2002
- RE: bereshit, Lisbeth S. Fried, 03/17/2002
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.