b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum
List archive
- From: "Ian Hutchesson" <mc2499 AT mclink.it>
- To: "'Biblical Hebrew'" <b-hebrew AT franklin.metalab.unc.edu>
- Subject: Re: bereshit
- Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2002 02:38:33 +0100
Peter, I can only take your response as avoiding the basic content you are
responding to.
In attempting to understand why all the examples of bywm
I indicated existed govern a clause and not just a noun,
I posited an idea. You respond to only that element of my
post and this:
>Also, I quite deliberately wrote "seems" in "Gen 1:1 seems to be a
>unique construction with no exact parallels", though "as far as I know"
>would have been more precise. No one in this debate or previous ones has
>quoted any exact parallels,
But the exact parallel that you want is a requirement
that you are unable to supply with your contention.
I have supplied very many citations for the government
of clauses by time phrases such as bywm. You don't
consider that evidence at all. As I said, bywm
routinely governs clauses and all examples of br'$yt
are qualified examples. Please, look at the evidence.
>and indeed if we require parallels with
>bereshit as the first word there are certainly none.
As the first word of what? A book? A sentence?
>You have found some examples...
You've progressed from "a few" to "some", but there
are more than just "some".
>...which are quite closely parallel but not exactly so, and I have
>discussed them.
Sorry, Peter, I must have missed it. The first time
you brushed aside the examples as "a few" without
comment on them. You seem to do the same again here.
>I invite you and others on the list to submit other
>close parallels, especially of the form B-noun verb subject object
>W-subject verb... (noun is temporal, no article, absolute or construct).
Please check each of the references I gave in the
previous post. There were at least ten, plus the four
in my original post and I said that there were many
more if you did a search for yourself. Peter! Your
invitation is a bit late and I gather you simply
didn't read much of my post, offended with my
attempts to understand why these time phrases such as
bywm and l`t take full clauses without something
like 'mr as in other apparent noun phrases.
Ian
-
RE: bereshit,
Peter Kirk, 03/12/2002
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: bereshit, Ian Hutchesson, 03/12/2002
- RE: bereshit, Peter Kirk, 03/13/2002
- Re: bereshit, Ian Hutchesson, 03/13/2002
- RE: bereshit, Peter Kirk, 03/13/2002
- Re: bereshit, Ian Hutchesson, 03/13/2002
- Re: bereshit, Ian Hutchesson, 03/14/2002
- RE: bereshit, Peter Kirk, 03/14/2002
- Re: bereshit, Ian Hutchesson, 03/14/2002
- RE: bereshit, Peter Kirk, 03/14/2002
- Re: bereshit, Lawrence May, 03/14/2002
- Re: bereshit, Ian Hutchesson, 03/14/2002
- RE: bereshit, Peter Kirk, 03/15/2002
- Re: bereshit, Ian Hutchesson, 03/15/2002
- RE: bereshit, Peter Kirk, 03/15/2002
- Re: bereshit, Ian Hutchesson, 03/15/2002
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.