sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
Re: [SM-Discuss] Separate "developer" list for admins?
- From: David Kowis <dkowis AT shlrm.org>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] Separate "developer" list for admins?
- Date: Tue, 06 Apr 2010 17:46:42 -0500
On 4/6/2010 5:46 PM, flux wrote:
> Eric Sandall (eric AT sandall.us) wrote [10.04.07 07:42]:
>> I would prefer to have anyone with control of our resources as part of
>> our project, whether they be a Lead Developer, a Systems
>> Administrator, or our Public Relations officer.
>
> I'm good with this. I certainly prefer it myself.
>
>> We'll need an Issue Vote to change
>> http://www.sourcemage.org/SourceMage/Developer_Organization.
>
> Call to vote? :)
>
Give some more time for people to chime in? It's been like barely two
hours since you started actually discussing this.
David
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Separate "developer" list for admins?
, (continued)
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Separate "developer" list for admins?,
Eric Sandall, 04/06/2010
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Separate "developer" list for admins?,
flux, 04/06/2010
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Separate "developer" list for admins?,
Eric Sandall, 04/06/2010
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Separate "developer" list for admins?,
Jaka Kranjc, 04/06/2010
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Separate "developer" list for admins?, flux, 04/06/2010
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Separate "developer" list for admins?,
flux, 04/06/2010
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Separate "developer" list for admins?,
Eric Sandall, 04/06/2010
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Separate "developer" list for admins?,
flux, 04/06/2010
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Separate "developer" list for admins?, Eric Sandall, 04/06/2010
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Separate "developer" list for admins?, flux, 04/06/2010
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Separate "developer" list for admins?, David Kowis, 04/06/2010
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Separate "developer" list for admins?, Jeremy Blosser, 04/06/2010
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Separate "developer" list for admins?, Eric Sandall, 04/06/2010
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Separate "developer" list for admins?, Jeremy Blosser, 04/06/2010
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Separate "developer" list for admins?,
flux, 04/06/2010
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Separate "developer" list for admins?,
Eric Sandall, 04/06/2010
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Separate "developer" list for admins?,
Jaka Kranjc, 04/06/2010
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Separate "developer" list for admins?,
Eric Sandall, 04/06/2010
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Separate "developer" list for admins?,
Ladislav Hagara, 04/06/2010
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Separate "developer" list for admins?, flux, 04/06/2010
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Separate "developer" list for admins?, David Kowis, 04/06/2010
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Separate "developer" list for admins?, flux, 04/06/2010
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Separate "developer" list for admins?,
flux, 04/06/2010
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Separate "developer" list for admins?, Eric Sandall, 04/06/2010
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Separate "developer" list for admins?, flux, 04/06/2010
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Separate "developer" list for admins?, Eric Sandall, 04/06/2010
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Separate "developer" list for admins?,
Eric Sandall, 04/06/2010
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.