sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List

List archive

Re: [SM-Discuss] Separate "developer" list for admins?

From: Jaka Kranjc <smgl AT lynxlynx.info>
To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] Separate "developer" list for admins?
Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2010 23:59:14 +0200

Btw, I'm pretty sure all of the admins committed stuff in the last year, so
they are safe anyway. I'm not certain only about Dave.

LP
--
We cannot command nature except by obeying her. --Sir Francis Bacon
Have a sourcerous day! www.sourcemage.org

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

[SM-Discuss] Separate "developer" list for admins?, flux, 04/04/2010
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Separate "developer" list for admins?, Eric Sandall, 04/06/2010
  - Re: [SM-Discuss] Separate "developer" list for admins?, flux, 04/06/2010
    - Re: [SM-Discuss] Separate "developer" list for admins?, Eric Sandall, 04/06/2010
      - Re: [SM-Discuss] Separate "developer" list for admins?, Jaka Kranjc, 04/06/2010
        
        Re: [SM-Discuss] Separate "developer" list for admins?, flux, 04/06/2010
      - Re: [SM-Discuss] Separate "developer" list for admins?, flux, 04/06/2010
        
        Re: [SM-Discuss] Separate "developer" list for admins?, Eric Sandall, 04/06/2010
        
        Re: [SM-Discuss] Separate "developer" list for admins?, flux, 04/06/2010
        
        Re: [SM-Discuss] Separate "developer" list for admins?, Eric Sandall, 04/06/2010
        Re: [SM-Discuss] Separate "developer" list for admins?, flux, 04/06/2010
        Re: [SM-Discuss] Separate "developer" list for admins?, David Kowis, 04/06/2010
        
        Re: [SM-Discuss] Separate "developer" list for admins?, Jeremy Blosser, 04/06/2010
        Re: [SM-Discuss] Separate "developer" list for admins?, Eric Sandall, 04/06/2010
        Re: [SM-Discuss] Separate "developer" list for admins?, Jeremy Blosser, 04/06/2010