Public SourceMage Discussion List

[flux <flux AT sourcemage.org>]

Eric Sandall (eric AT sandall.us) wrote [10.04.07 07:26]:
> This brings up the questions of do we want the admins to be part of  
> our project (I'm for yes) and do the admins want to be considered as  
> part of this project?
> 
> Perhaps if we replace "Developer" with "Member" in our current  
> terminology and add sub-groups of "Admin" and "Developer" (for now,  
> with possible future roles as needed) where "Developer" has the added  
> onus of a commit quota.

I'm OK with this, as long as everyone else is. It does restrict the
admins in terms of who they can have as assistant/backup admins though.
As long as there's no shortage of admins with interest in the project
that won't be a problem, of course.

-- 
Justin "flux_control" Boffemmyer
Cauldron wizard and general mage
Source Mage GNU/Linux
http://www.sourcemage.org

Attachment: pgpFpjRvVVFVK.pgp
Description: PGP signature