Public SourceMage Discussion List

[Eric Sandall <eric AT sandall.us>]

Quoting flux <flux AT sourcemage.org>:

> I'm going through our developer list for cleanup. I know some developers
> are kept in the list because they are admins. This got me thinking
> though, and I would like to propose a separate list of the Source Mage
> admins, in addition to the developer list. It has the following
> advantages:
>
> - No worries about who should/shouldn't be dropped as a developer based
>   on admin status
>
> - Credit is more accurately given (those who are both admins and
>   developers get credit for both, those performing only one role only
>   get credit for that one role)
>
> - If there's a major problem with one of the servers, developers know
>   who to actually contact for help (leads should always know the main
>   admins, but this will help to keep track of backup admins as well).
>
> If we want to come up with a new term for the admins, I'm fine with that
> (keepers?).
>
> Request For Comment.

I would be okay with this so long as the "admin" category also counts  
as Developers for voting and other requirements. Basically the same  
requirements except for the commit quota.

-sandalle

--
Eric Sandall                     |  Source Mage GNU/Linux Developer
eric AT sandall.us PGP: 0xA8EFDD61  |  http://www.sourcemage.org/
http://eric.sandall.us/          |  http://counter.li.org/  #196285