Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

sm-discuss - Re: [SM-Discuss] Separate "developer" list for admins?

sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Eric Sandall <eric AT sandall.us>
  • To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] Separate "developer" list for admins?
  • Date: Tue, 06 Apr 2010 16:06:38 -0700

Quoting flux <flux AT sourcemage.org>:

Eric Sandall (eric AT sandall.us) wrote [10.04.07 07:50]:
Perhaps (partially taken and modified from
http://www.sourcemage.org/SourceMage/Glossary, which we may need to
update if we decide on these (or other alterations)):
Member -> Guru
General Developer -> Mage
Lead Developer -> Elder
Project/Component Lead -> Arch-wizard or Arch-mage
Assistant -> Master
Admin -> Sage

-sandalle

I'm guessing we should have a separate vote for these if we first vote
on separating the lists?

I don't believe the Glossary requires an Issue Vote to change, it's more of a guide than a policy document.

-sandalle

--
Eric Sandall | Source Mage GNU/Linux Developer
eric AT sandall.us PGP: 0xA8EFDD61 | http://www.sourcemage.org/
http://eric.sandall.us/ | http://counter.li.org/ #196285




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page