sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
Re: [SM-Discuss] Separate "developer" list for admins?
- From: flux <flux AT sourcemage.org>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] Separate "developer" list for admins?
- Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2010 07:46:33 +0900
Eric Sandall (eric AT sandall.us) wrote [10.04.07 07:42]:
> I would prefer to have anyone with control of our resources as part of
> our project, whether they be a Lead Developer, a Systems
> Administrator, or our Public Relations officer.
I'm good with this. I certainly prefer it myself.
> We'll need an Issue Vote to change
> http://www.sourcemage.org/SourceMage/Developer_Organization.
Call to vote? :)
--
Justin "flux_control" Boffemmyer
Cauldron wizard and general mage
Source Mage GNU/Linux
http://www.sourcemage.org
Attachment:
pgpO9qUDp_jp8.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-
[SM-Discuss] Separate "developer" list for admins?,
flux, 04/04/2010
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Separate "developer" list for admins?,
Eric Sandall, 04/06/2010
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Separate "developer" list for admins?,
flux, 04/06/2010
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Separate "developer" list for admins?,
Eric Sandall, 04/06/2010
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Separate "developer" list for admins?,
Jaka Kranjc, 04/06/2010
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Separate "developer" list for admins?, flux, 04/06/2010
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Separate "developer" list for admins?,
flux, 04/06/2010
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Separate "developer" list for admins?,
Eric Sandall, 04/06/2010
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Separate "developer" list for admins?,
flux, 04/06/2010
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Separate "developer" list for admins?, Eric Sandall, 04/06/2010
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Separate "developer" list for admins?, flux, 04/06/2010
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Separate "developer" list for admins?, David Kowis, 04/06/2010
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Separate "developer" list for admins?, Jeremy Blosser, 04/06/2010
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Separate "developer" list for admins?, Eric Sandall, 04/06/2010
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Separate "developer" list for admins?, Jeremy Blosser, 04/06/2010
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Separate "developer" list for admins?,
flux, 04/06/2010
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Separate "developer" list for admins?,
Eric Sandall, 04/06/2010
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Separate "developer" list for admins?,
Jaka Kranjc, 04/06/2010
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Separate "developer" list for admins?,
Eric Sandall, 04/06/2010
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Separate "developer" list for admins?,
Ladislav Hagara, 04/06/2010
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Separate "developer" list for admins?, flux, 04/06/2010
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Separate "developer" list for admins?, David Kowis, 04/06/2010
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Separate "developer" list for admins?, flux, 04/06/2010
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Separate "developer" list for admins?,
flux, 04/06/2010
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Separate "developer" list for admins?, Eric Sandall, 04/06/2010
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Separate "developer" list for admins?, flux, 04/06/2010
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Separate "developer" list for admins?,
Eric Sandall, 04/06/2010
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.