Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

sm-discuss - Re: [SM-Discuss] Separate "developer" list for admins?

sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: David Kowis <dkowis AT shlrm.org>
  • To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] Separate "developer" list for admins?
  • Date: Tue, 06 Apr 2010 17:44:23 -0500

On 4/6/2010 5:44 PM, flux wrote:
> Ladislav Hagara (ladislav.hagara AT unob.cz) wrote [10.04.07 07:38]:
>> We should coddle our admins. Admins are certainly part of our project.
>> The questions is if they want to be related with us. :-)
>>
>> Members, Admin and Developers are OK, only we could have more sorcerous
>> scheme. :-)
>
> Admins = The Keepers?
> Developers = The Mages? (what we have already)
> Members = The Blessed? (because we're the best :-P)
>

Admins = Sorcerers (Operating on sheer force of will)
Developers = Wizards (Operating with the knowledge of the grimoire)
Members = Mages (do stuff?)

Partially serious,
David

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page