Public SourceMage Discussion List

[Eric Sandall <eric AT sandall.us>]

Quoting flux <flux AT sourcemage.org>:

> Eric Sandall (eric AT sandall.us) wrote [10.04.07 05:54]:
> > I would be okay with this so long as the "admin" category also counts
> > as Developers for voting and other requirements. Basically the same
> > requirements except for the commit quota.
>
> What do admins have to do with voting? If someone is hosting our
> services, that requires that they also be a part of our project? I know
> that there are a few developers who are kept as "developers" because
> they are backup admins, even though they haven't done anything actively
> as a developer in several years. Are you suggesting that such people not
> be admins if they aren't participating in a way other than pure system
> administration?

I can't quite parse your last sentence, but for the rest all of our  
admins have been considered developers and have commit access, whether  
or not they use it. I don't believe this is a requirement of the  
admins per-se, but as they're listed as Developers and you want to  
move them out I don't believe they should lose any of the  
benefits/requirements we had before.

-sandalle

--
Eric Sandall                     |  Source Mage GNU/Linux Developer
eric AT sandall.us PGP: 0xA8EFDD61  |  http://www.sourcemage.org/
http://eric.sandall.us/          |  http://counter.li.org/  #196285