sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
[SM-Discuss] Separate "developer" list for admins?
- From: flux <flux AT sourcemage.org>
- To: SM-Discuss <sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: [SM-Discuss] Separate "developer" list for admins?
- Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2010 05:53:45 +0900
I'm going through our developer list for cleanup. I know some developers
are kept in the list because they are admins. This got me thinking
though, and I would like to propose a separate list of the Source Mage
admins, in addition to the developer list. It has the following
advantages:
- No worries about who should/shouldn't be dropped as a developer based
on admin status
- Credit is more accurately given (those who are both admins and
developers get credit for both, those performing only one role only
get credit for that one role)
- If there's a major problem with one of the servers, developers know
who to actually contact for help (leads should always know the main
admins, but this will help to keep track of backup admins as well).
If we want to come up with a new term for the admins, I'm fine with that
(keepers?).
Request For Comment.
--
Justin "flux_control" Boffemmyer
Cauldron wizard and general mage
Source Mage GNU/Linux
http://www.sourcemage.org
Attachment:
pgpWontes8Ux_.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-
[SM-Discuss] Separate "developer" list for admins?,
flux, 04/04/2010
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Separate "developer" list for admins?,
Eric Sandall, 04/06/2010
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Separate "developer" list for admins?,
flux, 04/06/2010
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Separate "developer" list for admins?,
Eric Sandall, 04/06/2010
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Separate "developer" list for admins?,
Jaka Kranjc, 04/06/2010
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Separate "developer" list for admins?, flux, 04/06/2010
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Separate "developer" list for admins?,
flux, 04/06/2010
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Separate "developer" list for admins?,
Eric Sandall, 04/06/2010
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Separate "developer" list for admins?,
flux, 04/06/2010
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Separate "developer" list for admins?, Eric Sandall, 04/06/2010
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Separate "developer" list for admins?, flux, 04/06/2010
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Separate "developer" list for admins?,
flux, 04/06/2010
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Separate "developer" list for admins?,
Eric Sandall, 04/06/2010
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Separate "developer" list for admins?,
Jaka Kranjc, 04/06/2010
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Separate "developer" list for admins?,
Eric Sandall, 04/06/2010
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Separate "developer" list for admins?,
flux, 04/06/2010
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Separate "developer" list for admins?,
Eric Sandall, 04/06/2010
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.