sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
[SM-Discuss] RFC: clarification of lead voting process
- From: flux <flux AT sourcemage.org>
- To: SM-Discuss <sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: [SM-Discuss] RFC: clarification of lead voting process
- Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2010 01:31:08 +0900
From http://sourcemage.org/SourceMage/Voting_Policy:
• Votes require a simple majority (greater than 50% of all votes cast)
to pass.
If what is in parentheses is interpreted literally, then a vote in which
there are 3 candidates and 20 votes total would require that one
candidate receive 11 of the votes, leaving 9 to be divided among the
other 2, in order to be elected. In my opinion, that's a (potentially)
landslide victory rather than a simple majority. I believe what's in
parentheses is meant as an example, in which case we should clarify the
language to indicate that it needs to be greater than 50% for 2
candidates. If it is not just an example and all candidates need greater
than 50% of all votes cast to be elected, then lots of luck to the 3
candidates running for Grimiore Lead...
--
Justin "flux_control" Boffemmyer
Cauldron wizard and general mage
Source Mage GNU/Linux
http://www.sourcemage.org
Attachment:
pgptEsXPKPtYz.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-
[SM-Discuss] RFC: clarification of lead voting process,
flux, 04/05/2010
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] RFC: clarification of lead voting process,
Jeremy Blosser, 04/05/2010
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] RFC: clarification of lead voting process,
flux, 04/05/2010
- Re: [SM-Discuss] RFC: clarification of lead voting process, Jeremy Blosser, 04/05/2010
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] RFC: clarification of lead voting process,
flux, 04/05/2010
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] RFC: clarification of lead voting process,
Jeremy Blosser, 04/05/2010
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.