sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: "Bertrand Juglas" <b AT juglas.name>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org, flux AT sourcemage.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] Testing of devel ISO 20080322
- Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2008 18:11:01 +0200
Hello all,
Like Eric Sandall, i've tested the latest Devel ISO on KVM using
virt-manager GUI without problems. I'm planning to sharp the Linux
kernel config to avoid loading old CDrom kernel modules since virtual
machines only have standard virtual hardware.
I renew my idea of publishing an updated kvm virtual machine image
each time a new major component devel version is to be tested.
Having also a "stable" image could also be used as an virtual appliance base.
What would you think of that ideas ?
2008/4/12, flux <flux AT sourcemage.org>:
> Arjan Bouter (abouter AT sourcemage.org) wrote [08.04.11 05:46]:
>
> > On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 10:04:16AM +0200, Remko van der Vossen wrote:
> > > On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 09:50:36AM +0200, Mathieu L. wrote:
> > > > links != lynx
> > > > altough it doesn't matter which one is included as long as it can do
> > > > https. If w3m can then so be it.
> > >
> > > I don't think it matters much which is included, but if w3m is chosen I
> > > think it would be wise to default to the lynxlike keybindings instead
> of
> > > the w3m ones, that's what most people are comfortable with.
> > >
> > > btw, I'm talking links-twibright when I say links.
> > >
> > > All of these can do https when compiled with support btw, so there's no
> > > issue there. Both links and w3m do frames, links also does javascript.
> > > Both w3m and links could do framebuffer graphics, but that's probably a
> > > bit too much for the iso, at least for now.
> > >
> > > Remko.
> >
> > Personally I'd go for links-twibright, but that's probably because I use
> > it a lot ;)
> > But I agree with Remko, either one would be good.
> >
> > May I suggest to have it open with a page explaining the used
> > keybindings? That would help out people who have never used it before
> > and take only a tiny amount of space, compared to including the
> > documentation. Just the basic and often used keys would be enough.
> >
> > Arjan
>
>
> My reason for saying "lynx" instead of any of the other numerous text
> browsers (nobody mentioned netriks? Or retawq? ;-P) is that anybody who
> really needs some kind of web help (whether it's from a local html help
> file or going online if they set up networking), it will likely be
> someone who is coming from another distro. Even if it is not someone
> coming from another distro, "lynx" is seen as THE text browser. No
> matter what text browser you are used to, everyone knows lynx, and if
> your preferred browser is not available, you will know to type in "lynx"
> at the command prompt to get a text browser, and you will likely know
> how to use it. If not, you can read the man page (man *is* provided on
> the ISO).
>
> I was going for using "the standard" to avoid confusion and whatever,
> hinted at by the mention of listing what keybindings were being used ;).
> Lynx is the simple answer here, even if it may not be the "correct"
> answer (though everyone will have a different opinion on what is
> "correct" anyway).
>
>
> --
> Justin "flux" Boffemmyer
> Cauldron wizard and general mage
> Source Mage GNU/Linux
> http://www.sourcemage.org
>
> _______________________________________________
> SM-Discuss mailing list
> SM-Discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-discuss
>
>
>
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Testing of devel ISO 20080322
, (continued)
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Testing of devel ISO 20080322,
Thomas Orgis, 04/10/2008
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Testing of devel ISO 20080322,
flux, 04/10/2008
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Testing of devel ISO 20080322, Eric Sandall, 04/10/2008
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Testing of devel ISO 20080322,
Mathieu L., 04/10/2008
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Testing of devel ISO 20080322,
flux, 04/10/2008
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Testing of devel ISO 20080322, Ladislav Hagara, 04/11/2008
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Testing of devel ISO 20080322,
Mathieu L., 04/11/2008
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Testing of devel ISO 20080322,
Remko van der Vossen, 04/11/2008
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Testing of devel ISO 20080322, Arjan Bouter, 04/11/2008
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Testing of devel ISO 20080322, flux, 04/12/2008
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Testing of devel ISO 20080322, Bertrand Juglas, 04/13/2008
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Testing of devel ISO 20080322, flux, 04/13/2008
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Testing of devel ISO 20080322, Bertrand Juglas, 04/13/2008
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Testing of devel ISO 20080322, Andraž 'ruskie' Levstik, 04/14/2008
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Testing of devel ISO 20080322, Ismael Luceno, 04/14/2008
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Testing of devel ISO 20080322, Bertrand Juglas, 04/14/2008
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Testing of devel ISO 20080322, Eric Sandall, 04/14/2008
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Testing of devel ISO 20080322,
Remko van der Vossen, 04/11/2008
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Testing of devel ISO 20080322,
flux, 04/10/2008
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Testing of devel ISO 20080322,
flux, 04/10/2008
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Testing of devel ISO 20080322,
Thomas Orgis, 04/10/2008
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Testing of devel ISO 20080322,
Andraž 'ruskie' Levstik, 04/11/2008
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Testing of devel ISO 20080322,
Eric Sandall, 04/11/2008
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Testing of devel ISO 20080322, Andraž 'ruskie' Levstik, 04/11/2008
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Testing of devel ISO 20080322,
Eric Sandall, 04/11/2008
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.