Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

sm-discuss - Re: [SM-Discuss] Let's make Source Mage not suck!

sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Andrew <afrayedknot AT thefrayedknot.armory.com>
  • To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] Let's make Source Mage not suck!
  • Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2007 13:09:43 -0800

On Thu, Jan 04, 2007 at 08:00:47PM +0100, Jaka Kranjc wrote:
> On Thursday 04 January 2007 19:27, Andrew wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 04, 2007 at 06:34:58PM +0100, Mathieu L. wrote:
> > > you know most of the bugs I had in ftp section were posted against
> > > stable or stable-rc, and they were not version bumps. So I fixed a few
> > > of them in test, and requested for integration in stable-rc and stable,
> > > wasn't that how we were supposed to work?
> >
> > Sort of, the mis-understanding is that you were supposed to fix all the
> > bugs in the entire section. Only the spells in whatever list we had
> > picked mattered. The rest of the fixes are "nice-to-have" and would get
> > picked up in the cycle. The shouldn't have been to fix all the bugs in
> > all the sections right now before or else we cant release. It was a
> > mistake that it was presented that way.
> You make it sound like there was such a list. We only get a few "must fix
> before release+" now and then, nothing organised like the last time.
> Without
> any focus or directions, everybody just does random stuff.
>

There was a list, it was derived from ledger's usage statistics.

--
_________________________________________________________________________
| Andrew D. Stitt | acedit at armory.com | astitt at sourcemage.org |
| irc: afrayedknot | Sorcery Team Lead | ftp://t.armory.com/ |
| 1024D/D39B096C | 76E4 728A 04EE 62B2 A09A 96D7 4D9E 239B D39B 096C |
-------------------------------------------------------------------------




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page