Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

sm-discuss - Re: [SM-Discuss] CMS talks (was Re: website)

sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: "Pieter Lenaerts" <e-type AT sourcemage.org>
  • To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] CMS talks (was Re: website)
  • Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 17:35:49 +0200 (CEST)

On Fri, October 20, 2006 16:16, Jeremy Blosser wrote:
> On Oct 20, Pieter Lenaerts [e-type AT sourcemage.org] wrote:
>> I guess this discussion has lead to two different topics, the docs topic
>> and the cms topic.
>>
>> the docs topic is covered in another thread, so let's focus on the cms
>> thing.
>
> I don't see them as very different things. We need docs, and we need a
> website that support our docs.

Those are two different things iyam: the content and the presentation

> What I'd like to see is a group start doing
> docs and then -- after they have them -- identify what they need from a
> site. Then we can do an eval. I don't want to waste^Wspend a lot of time
> on an eval when we don't really know what we need til we have some success
> producing content.

I don't agree with this at all.

iyam the content is completely seperated from how we present it.

people can continue/start writing like hell, loose from the evaluation of
drupal or any cms.

why would docs contain different information in a different cms? of course
some conversion may be necessary, but again, this has nothing to do with
the content.


--
Pieter Lenaerts
Source Mage GNU/Linux

http://www.sourcemage.org - "Linux so advanced it may well be magic"




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page