sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: Jeremy Blosser <jblosser-smgl AT firinn.org>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] Apache 2 Spell . . .
- Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2006 11:52:07 -0500
On Oct 11, David Kowis [dkowis AT shlrm.org] wrote:
> Jason Flatt wrote:
> > On Tuesday 10 October 2006 12:30, David Kowis wrote:
> >> I'm going to concur with this. We should stick to the default
> >> DocumentRoot.
> >> It's a system administration task to ensure that your installed web
> >> applications are accessible by apache. Having spells put things there is
> >> okay as well, however switching to a /usr/share/$(SPELL)/www might make
> >> more sense from the spell management perspective, as all the things
> >> related
> >> to that spell are in the same location. The files meant to be accessible
> >> from the Internet are separated well enough to make it work out of the
> >> box
> >> with minor adjustments to apache.
> >>
> >> David
> >
> > Umm, what would be the point of adding a www after /usr/share/$(SPELL)?
> > That
> > would just put the files one level deeper w/o any real need. They would
> > already be separated based on the spell's name.
> >
> Well currently, if a spell has files they go in
> /usr/share/${SPELL}/[doc|info|whatever]
> and the www files go in /usr/share/www/${SPELL}
>
> For the point of organization, it'd be better for all the spell's files to
> be
> installed under /usr/share/${SPELL}
I'd really rather we just went back to this and tossed install_www_files.
It doesn't strike me as particular standard what we do now and I don't see
web app spells as something special that need their own standard vs the
regular /usr/share/$SPELL that other similar stuff uses.
Attachment:
pgpgLqcEhXDm5.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-
[SM-Discuss] Apache 2 Spell . . .,
Jason Flatt, 10/10/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Apache 2 Spell . . .,
Eric Sandall, 10/10/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Apache 2 Spell . . .,
Jeremy Blosser, 10/10/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Apache 2 Spell . . .,
David Kowis, 10/10/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Apache 2 Spell . . .,
Jason Flatt, 10/11/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Apache 2 Spell . . .,
David Kowis, 10/11/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Apache 2 Spell . . ., Jason Flatt, 10/11/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Apache 2 Spell . . ., Jeremy Blosser, 10/11/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Apache 2 Spell . . .,
David Kowis, 10/11/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Apache 2 Spell . . .,
Jason Flatt, 10/11/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Apache 2 Spell . . ., Jason Flatt, 10/11/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Apache 2 Spell . . .,
David Kowis, 10/10/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Apache 2 Spell . . .,
Jeremy Blosser, 10/10/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Apache 2 Spell . . .,
Bearcat M. Sandor, 10/10/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Apache 2 Spell . . .,
Arjan Bouter, 10/11/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Apache 2 Spell . . .,
Jason Flatt, 10/11/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Apache 2 Spell . . ., Arjan Bouter, 10/11/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Apache 2 Spell . . ., Robin Cook, 10/12/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Apache 2 Spell . . .,
Jason Flatt, 10/11/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Apache 2 Spell . . .,
Arjan Bouter, 10/11/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Apache 2 Spell . . .,
Jason Flatt, 10/11/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Apache 2 Spell . . ., Andraž "ruskie" Levstik, 10/11/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Apache 2 Spell . . .,
Eric Sandall, 10/10/2006
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.