Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

sm-discuss - Re: [SM-Discuss] Apache 2 Spell . . .

sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Jeremy Blosser <jblosser-smgl AT firinn.org>
  • To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] Apache 2 Spell . . .
  • Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2006 11:52:07 -0500

On Oct 11, David Kowis [dkowis AT shlrm.org] wrote:
> Jason Flatt wrote:
> > On Tuesday 10 October 2006 12:30, David Kowis wrote:
> >> I'm going to concur with this. We should stick to the default
> >> DocumentRoot.
> >> It's a system administration task to ensure that your installed web
> >> applications are accessible by apache. Having spells put things there is
> >> okay as well, however switching to a /usr/share/$(SPELL)/www might make
> >> more sense from the spell management perspective, as all the things
> >> related
> >> to that spell are in the same location. The files meant to be accessible
> >> from the Internet are separated well enough to make it work out of the
> >> box
> >> with minor adjustments to apache.
> >>
> >> David
> >
> > Umm, what would be the point of adding a www after /usr/share/$(SPELL)?
> > That
> > would just put the files one level deeper w/o any real need. They would
> > already be separated based on the spell's name.
> >
> Well currently, if a spell has files they go in
> /usr/share/${SPELL}/[doc|info|whatever]
> and the www files go in /usr/share/www/${SPELL}
>
> For the point of organization, it'd be better for all the spell's files to
> be
> installed under /usr/share/${SPELL}

I'd really rather we just went back to this and tossed install_www_files.
It doesn't strike me as particular standard what we do now and I don't see
web app spells as something special that need their own standard vs the
regular /usr/share/$SPELL that other similar stuff uses.

Attachment: pgpgLqcEhXDm5.pgp
Description: PGP signature




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page