Public SourceMage Discussion List

[Robin Cook <rcook AT wyrms.net>]

Is there a way to get it so there is the option to build everything as
modules except those that have to be builtin the way httpd-dev did it?
I am now getting errors as my httpd.conf is trying to load modules and
it is saying it is built in.

CuZnDragon
Robin Cook

On Wed, 2006-10-11 at 13:51 +0200, Arjan Bouter wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Oct 2006 12:48:24 -0600
> "Bearcat M. Sandor" <sourcemage AT feline-soul.com> wrote:
> 
> > There is a bug about this in bugs.sourcemage.org. You might want to add 
> > your 
> > comments to that.  
> > 
> > I have casted the apache22 spell and it works flawlessly.
> > 
> > Bearcat
> 
> Thanks :)
> 
> There were quite a few changes in apache 2.2.*, which is why i've created 
> another spell for it.
> One of the changes is (as you noticed) that it ignores the configure 
> options in favor of a layout.
> 
> Another change is the renaming of the modules, some of which have missing 
> --enable or --disable options.
> The same might be true for httpd-dev, i haven't had the time to check that 
> yet.
> 
> The apache22 spell is using a custom SMGL layout which i tried to keep 
> pretty much the same as the usual layout.
> I'd recommend to use this for the apache2 spell as well.
> 
> Arjan Bouter
> 
> > 
> > On Tuesday 10 October 2006 10:30 in an email titled "[SM-Discuss] Apache 
> > 2 
> > Spell . . ." Jason Flatt wrote:
> > >There is an issue with the apache2 spell (and maybe the apache22 spell,
> > > though I haven't checked) that I wanted to present for possible 
> > > solutions. 
> > > It seems the configure script pretty much ignores any setting of 
> > > --prefix
> > > (and related options) and will only use settings defined in 
> > > config.layout. 
> > > Currently the spell is set to use the layout of GNU, and that puts
> > > everything in /usr/local (not specifying a layout seems to be pretty 
> > > close
> > > to the same as specifying GNU).  There isn't a perfect layout choice 
> > > which
> > > maps directly with where we install files by default.
> > >
> > >There are two options, as I see it:
> > > 1) Use the Debian layout instead, which is the closest to how we do it, 
> > > of
> > >    the options already available.
> > > 2) Create a patch where I define a new layout that is exactly how we do 
> > > it,
> > >    then set the spell to use that layout.
> > >
> > >Is it acceptable enough to use the Debian layout, or should I create a
> > >SourceMage (LSB?) layout?  Here is the definition of the Debian layout 
> > >(if
> > >you want to see what other layouts are available, see the config.layout 
> > >file
> > >in the root directory of the source):
> > >
> > ># Debian layout
> > ><Layout Debian>
> > >    prefix:
> > >    exec_prefix:   ${prefix}/usr
> > >    bindir:        ${exec_prefix}/bin
> > >    sbindir:       ${exec_prefix}/sbin
> > >    libdir:        ${exec_prefix}/lib
> > >    libexecdir:    ${exec_prefix}/lib/apache2/modules
> > >    mandir:        ${exec_prefix}/share/man
> > >    sysconfdir:    ${prefix}/etc/apache2
> > >    datadir:       ${exec_prefix}/share/apache2
> > >    iconsdir:      ${datadir}/icons
> > >    htdocsdir:     ${prefix}/usr/share/apache2/default-site/htdocs
> > >    manualdir:     ${htdocsdir}/manual
> > >    cgidir:        ${prefix}/usr/lib/cgi-bin
> > >    includedir:    ${exec_prefix}/include/apache2
> > >    localstatedir: ${prefix}/var/run
> > >    runtimedir:    ${prefix}/var/run
> > >    logfiledir:    ${prefix}/var/log/apache2
> > >    proxycachedir: ${prefix}/var/cache/apache2/proxy
> > >    infodir:       ${exec_prefix}/share/info
> > >    installbuilddir: ${prefix}/etc/apache2/build
> > >    errordir:      ${datadir}/error
> > ></Layout>
> 
> 
> 
> +=======
> Source Mage GNU/Linux developer,
> http://www.sourcemage.org
> Registered as user #310617 with the Linux Counter,
> http://counter.li.org.
> GnuPG Key 79D4B14E = 94AD 3FD1 E259 67ED 632E  2B06 CFBE 1154 79D4 B14E
> +===
> _______________________________________________
> SM-Discuss mailing list
> SM-Discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-discuss

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part