sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: Andrew <afrayedknot AT thefrayedknot.armory.com>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] splitting cvs spells
- Date: Sat, 7 Oct 2006 11:22:08 -0700
On Sat, Oct 07, 2006 at 02:27:24PM +0200, Flavien Bridault wrote:
> Le samedi 07 octobre 2006 à 14:12 +0500, Alexander Tsamutali a écrit :
> > > The force_depends would be conditional upon the gtk+ version. So it
> > > wouldn't force recompilation unless the version is different. "version
> > > is different" of course could be defined as "major version bump" so
> > > minor version bumps would not force recompilation. Spells have a pretty
> > > wide range of freedom over how they use an interface. Please consider
> > > the possibilities more carefully.
> >
> > You mean something like:
> >
> > depends gtk+2
> > if installed_version gtk+2 <= 2.16 ; then
> > force_depends gtk+2
> > fi
> >
> > Yes that is what i want, but IMHO it would be better to put this code
> > into sorcery, not in spell.
> That's not necessary to modify sorcery for this, a function in
> libgrimoire is more appropriate, right Andrew ?
Yep, in the grimoire FUNCTIONS file, or some other grimoire library
for common DEPENDS stuff. (libgrimoire is actually a sorcery file,
but i know what you meant).
--
_________________________________________________________________________
| Andrew D. Stitt | acedit at armory.com | astitt at sourcemage.org |
| irc: afrayedknot | Sorcery Team Lead | ftp://t.armory.com/ |
| 1024D/D39B096C | 76E4 728A 04EE 62B2 A09A 96D7 4D9E 239B D39B 096C |
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] splitting cvs spells
, (continued)
- Re: [SM-Discuss] splitting cvs spells, Ladislav Hagara, 10/09/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] splitting cvs spells,
Alexander Tsamutali, 10/06/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] splitting cvs spells, Andraž "ruskie" Levstik, 10/06/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] splitting cvs spells,
Andrew, 10/06/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] splitting cvs spells,
Alexander Tsamutali, 10/06/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] splitting cvs spells,
Andraž "ruskie" Levstik, 10/06/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] splitting cvs spells,
Alexander Tsamutali, 10/06/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] splitting cvs spells,
Andrew, 10/07/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] splitting cvs spells, Alexander Tsamutali, 10/07/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] splitting cvs spells, Flavien Bridault, 10/07/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] splitting cvs spells, Andrew, 10/07/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] splitting cvs spells, Andraž "ruskie" Levstik, 10/07/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] splitting cvs spells, Jeremy Blosser, 10/10/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] splitting cvs spells,
Andrew, 10/07/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] splitting cvs spells, Andrew, 10/07/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] splitting cvs spells, Alexander Tsamutali, 10/07/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] splitting cvs spells, Andrew, 10/07/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] splitting cvs spells, Alexander Tsamutali, 10/07/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] splitting cvs spells, Andrew, 10/08/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] splitting cvs spells,
Alexander Tsamutali, 10/06/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] splitting cvs spells,
Andraž "ruskie" Levstik, 10/06/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] splitting cvs spells,
Alexander Tsamutali, 10/06/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] splitting cvs spells, Andraž "ruskie" Levstik, 10/07/2006
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.