Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

sm-discuss - Re: [SM-Discuss] splitting cvs spells

sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Alexander Tsamutali <astsmtl AT gmail.com>
  • To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] splitting cvs spells
  • Date: Sun, 08 Oct 2006 08:56:31 +0500

Andrew wrote:
> You didnt answer the question. Instead you picked a broader premise and
> re-framed the question within that (ignoring all other points and
> counterpoints made previously). Nice try though. Care to try again?
>
> Why does the force_depends version logic have to be in *sorcery*.

Sorry, i think you misunderstood me. This small chunk of code with
force_depends must live at the grimoire level. But if you decide that we
need some more generic solution, it goes into sorcery.

> That breaks one of the conditions mentioned in the currently utilized
> policy. Which is that all versions presented within the spell must work
> as dependencies. If they dont the spell must be split. So this is not
> a realistic example.

This condition is a limitation. I dont think that splitting spells with
different versions is a good thing.
sub_depends was great generic solution, solved some problems. IMHO
version_depends is equally imortant.

--
Alexander Tsamutali




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page