Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

sm-discuss - Re: [SM-Discuss] Patches in grimoires

sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Matthew Clark <MatthewClark AT InLesserTerms.net>
  • To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] Patches in grimoires
  • Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 10:16:05 -0500

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1



Andraž "ruskie" Levstik wrote:
>>> Why a date??? I thought about it BUT the date is already in the spell's
>>> HISTORY entry so I don't see a real reason for it.
>> Yeah, okay. I'm a big boy -- I can take the time to hunt for information.
>>
> I would still like to see a reason for this. Basicaly while I was writing
> the document I thought about adding dates but couldn't find a good enough
> reason to add it. I'm not saying it's a bad idea I'd just like to have a
> good
> reason for adding something.

Ah, gotcha. Well, it's hard for me to explain without looking like a
wierdo, but my personal reason: I like dates. In fact, I LOVE dates.
Dates on stuff make me happy. Keeps me from getting confused. I don't
know how many people out there are the same way. But really, it's not
significant now that I think about your idea more.

So really, there is no need for it after all, I suppose -- as long as
there's the sequence number and a HISTORY entry, I'll be able to
maintain sanity ;)

>
>>> zbly-bsa-blt-bah-tea-hie-ied-diod-thiao.diff and so on
>>> as more fields would get added.
>> What other fields?
>>
> The other fields people might start tosing about as an idea. Take it as
> a preemtive measure against having a ton of fields.
>
>> Well, as I mentioned, I hadn't thought it through. Just tossing ideas
>> around -- doesn't mean they are to be taken as suggestions.
>>
>> I guess I don't have any input, but I still like your idea...
>>
> You acctually have input :)
> And any idea is a suggestion... That's why I've posted this here
> to see what others think. At the moment this is still only an idea.

But, it's time for me to plug my pie hole and see what others have to
say :).

>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFEaJs17vwGAOVJvJ8RApc+AJ9NrEeCl/SqlEi88ss09Ve/2U73eACeL9vl
u5s0+oKI7DdNWRuTYm+2FHo=
=1bx9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page