sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: "Andraž \"ruskie\" Levstik" <ruskie AT mages.ath.cx>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] Patches in grimoires
- Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 16:36:57 +0200
Matthew Clark wrote :
>
> That's a pretty good idea. I'd also like to see a date inside the
> patch, or perhaps as part of the filename. Perhaps require the comments
> inside the patch file to follow the same format as HISTORY files, and/or
> name the files SEQ-P-NAME-YYYYMMDD.diff.
>
> I hadn't thought through it, though. But I like your idea.
>
>
Why a date??? I thought about it BUT the date is already in the spell's
HISTORY entry so I don't see a real reason for it.
But IF it would go then it would be as a comment and not part of the name
reason being I don't want all the info coded in the name as that would
produce something like:
zbly-bsa-blt-bah-tea-hie-ied-diod-thiao.diff and so on
as more fields would get added.
****
Also I'm thinking about rewamping our user/group handling as atm imho
it's just a hack. I'm thinking about writting a frontend to the useradd/pw
tools that would make it more friendly to porting to other platforms.
The thing I don't like about our current handling is that I can't define
anything BUT name and g/udi which is annoying. I'd basicaly like to be able to
define everything from name to shell with comments and so on.
I'd also like a clear definition from where onward are user G/UIDS.
I'd go with 500 for both but if someone else hase a better idea then please.
The only thing is I'd like to have BOTH gid and uid start at the same number.
--
Andraž "ruskie" Levstik
Source Mage GNU/Linux Games grimoire guru
Geek/Hacker/Tinker
Hacker FAQ: http://www.plethora.net/%7eseebs/faqs/hacker.html
Key id = A7A9E461
Key fingerprint = 757E C16B F5B7 DC27 B003 CCED CF95 3A77 A7A9 E461
-
[SM-Discuss] Patches in grimoires,
Andraž "ruskie" Levstik, 05/15/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Patches in grimoires,
Matthew Clark, 05/15/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Patches in grimoires,
Andraž "ruskie" Levstik, 05/15/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Patches in grimoires,
Matthew Clark, 05/15/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Patches in grimoires,
Andraž "ruskie" Levstik, 05/15/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Patches in grimoires, Matthew Clark, 05/15/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Patches in grimoires,
Andraž "ruskie" Levstik, 05/15/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Patches in grimoires, seth, 05/15/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Patches in grimoires, Jeremy Blosser, 05/15/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Patches in grimoires,
Matthew Clark, 05/15/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Patches in grimoires,
Andraž "ruskie" Levstik, 05/15/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Patches in grimoires,
Arwed von Merkatz, 05/15/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Patches in grimoires, Andraž "ruskie" Levstik, 05/15/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Patches in grimoires,
Jeremy Blosser, 05/15/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Patches in grimoires,
Flavien Bridault, 05/15/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Patches in grimoires, Jeremy Blosser, 05/15/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Patches in grimoires,
Flavien Bridault, 05/15/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Patches in grimoires,
Matthew Clark, 05/15/2006
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.