Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

sm-discuss - Re: [SM-Discuss] Patches in grimoires

sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Matthew Clark <MatthewClark AT InLesserTerms.net>
  • To: "Andraž \"ruskie\" Levstik" <ruskie AT mages.ath.cx>
  • Cc: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] Patches in grimoires
  • Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 09:50:41 -0500

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


Andraž "ruskie" Levstik wrote:
> Matthew Clark wrote :
>
>> That's a pretty good idea. I'd also like to see a date inside the
>> patch, or perhaps as part of the filename. Perhaps require the comments
>> inside the patch file to follow the same format as HISTORY files, and/or
>> name the files SEQ-P-NAME-YYYYMMDD.diff.
>>
>> I hadn't thought through it, though. But I like your idea.
>>
>>
>
> Why a date??? I thought about it BUT the date is already in the spell's
> HISTORY entry so I don't see a real reason for it.

Yeah, okay. I'm a big boy -- I can take the time to hunt for information.

>
> But IF it would go then it would be as a comment and not part of the name
> reason being I don't want all the info coded in the name as that would
> produce something like:
>
> zbly-bsa-blt-bah-tea-hie-ied-diod-thiao.diff and so on
> as more fields would get added.

What other fields?

Well, as I mentioned, I hadn't thought it through. Just tossing ideas
around -- doesn't mean they are to be taken as suggestions.

I guess I don't have any input, but I still like your idea...

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFEaJVB7vwGAOVJvJ8RAhRQAJ0ZFUJnrDiVtECkss6W065sbYx+VQCgofBW
CgAI1cHugn2SaW1SFGDQE1Q=
=t6ro
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page