Public SourceMage Discussion List

["Andraž \"ruskie\" Levstik" <ruskie AT mages.ath.cx>]

Karsten Behrmann wrote :

> gpg: Signature made pet 14 apr 2006 14:38:34 CEST using DSA key ID B3E0E7A3
> gpg: WARNING: signing subkey B3E0E7A3 is not cross-certified
> gpg: please see http://www.gnupg.org/faq/subkey-cross-certify.html for more
> information
> gpg: Good signature from "Karsten Behrmann <karstenbeh AT web.de>"
> gpg:                 aka "Karsten Behrmann (BearPerson/Sourcemage)
> <BearPerson AT gmx.net>"
> gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature!
> gpg:          There is no indication that the signature belongs to the 
> owner.

> Primary key fingerprint: 4249 3C63 01ED 258E 3225  7247 024B 0A2E 83B7 BF2C
>      Subkey fingerprint: F234 18CF AF8E 075A B938  4909 0BE3 C351 B3E0 E7A3
> 
> 
> On Wed, 12 Apr 2006 16:33:12 -0700, Seth Woolley wrote:
> 
> > Matthew Clark wrote:
> > > I recently began trying to improve the net-tools spell by replacing that
> > > long list of questions with a dialog.  
> > 
> > This breaks prometheus' ability to fuzz options easily.  Is there a way 
> > to make your changes optional?  I think rather than fixing this problem 
> > for one spell we should discuss the CONFIGURE (and DEPENDS) formats in 
> > the context of allowing alternative prompts and even the ability to use 
> > a make-menuconfig-style menu.
> 
> I believe the way I did this spell by the way was a
> "do you want to use dialog (recommended)? [n]"
> and if that query was answered with 'n' run through all the
> options with config_query's... wouldn't that work?
> 
> So Far,
>   Karsten
> 
> 

I'm happy with that... it's not the ideal solution but 99% of dialog using 
spells
should use something like that...

-- 
Andraž "ruskie" Levstik
Source Mage GNU/Linux Games grimoire guru
Geek/Hacker/Tinker

Hacker FAQ: http://www.plethora.net/%7eseebs/faqs/hacker.html

Key id = A7A9E461
Key fingerprint = 757E C16B F5B7 DC27 B003  CCED CF95 3A77 A7A9 E461