sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
Re: [SM-Discuss] How to handle multi-version spells
- From: "Jeremy Blosser (emrys)" <jblosser-smgl AT firinn.org>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] How to handle multi-version spells
- Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2005 14:58:39 -0500
On Aug 17, Ladislav Hagara [ladislav.hagara AT unob.cz] wrote:
> > IMHO NO(I feel very strongly about this) I don't like to use some
> > random thing
> > to set a version. I prefer for the VERSION=[whatever_scm_it_uses] approach
> > for non automatic(i.e. VERSION=cvs, VERSION=svn and so on).
>
>
> It was discussed several times.
> The VERSION=$(date +%Y%m%d) is the only way as to ensure the sources will
> be updated for normal users. Not all our users are linux specialists,
> they only want to use their favourite application. They use Source Mage
> because we provide CVS version of that application.
I'm not trying to reopen the conversation (unless it needs to happen), but
I thought the below was the original goal Arwed posted for VERSION, and
what I included in the doc. Arwed if we do want something different now
please explain:
"If the spell is not set to automatically update, VERSION should be set
to a constant string (e.g. HEAD, TRUNK). If the spell is set to
automatically update VERSION should be set to $(date +%Y%m%d). This will
lead to a new cache tarball every time the spell is updated which is
intentional. If an automatic update broke something, the user can dispel
-d to a previous version."
> The strange is I am not able to read
> http://www.sourcemage.org/spell-multi_version
> (Access denied You are not authorized to access this page).
It's not set to published since it is a draft. I did that so it wouldn't
show up in the automated index stuff, but apparently it also means you have
to be set up as a content editor in Drupal to see it. Ask one of the site
admins for that access if you don't have it.
Attachment:
pgpcmgzoHwMvZ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] How to handle multi-version spells
, (continued)
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] How to handle multi-version spells,
Eric Sandall, 08/17/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] How to handle multi-version spells,
Jeremy Blosser (emrys), 08/17/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] How to handle multi-version spells,
Eric Sandall, 08/17/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] How to handle multi-version spells,
Arwed von Merkatz, 08/17/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] How to handle multi-version spells,
Jason Flatt, 08/17/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] How to handle multi-version spells,
Andrew "ruskie" Levstik, 08/17/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Web Site Documentation Revision History (Was: How to handle multi-version spells), Jason Flatt, 08/17/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] How to handle multi-version spells,
Andrew "ruskie" Levstik, 08/17/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] How to handle multi-version spells,
Jeremy Blosser (emrys), 08/17/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] How to handle multi-version spells,
Andrew "ruskie" Levstik, 08/17/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] How to handle multi-version spells, Ladislav Hagara, 08/17/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] How to handle multi-version spells, Jeremy Blosser (emrys), 08/17/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] How to handle multi-version spells, Arwed von Merkatz, 08/18/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] How to handle multi-version spells, Andrew "ruskie" Levstik, 08/17/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] How to handle multi-version spells,
Andrew "ruskie" Levstik, 08/17/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] How to handle multi-version spells, Sergey A. Lipnevich, 08/17/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] How to handle multi-version spells, Eric Sandall, 08/17/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] How to handle multi-version spells,
Jason Flatt, 08/17/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] How to handle multi-version spells,
Arwed von Merkatz, 08/17/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] How to handle multi-version spells,
Ladislav Hagara, 08/17/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] How to handle multi-version spells, Seth Alan Woolley, 08/17/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] How to handle multi-version spells,
Eric Sandall, 08/17/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] How to handle multi-version spells,
Jeremy Blosser (emrys), 08/18/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] How to handle multi-version spells, Arwed von Merkatz, 08/19/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] How to handle multi-version spells,
Jeremy Blosser (emrys), 08/17/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] How to handle multi-version spells,
Eric Sandall, 08/17/2005
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.