sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
Re: [SM-Discuss] Better approach to firefox script
- From: Eric Sandall <eric AT sandall.us>
- To: "Jeremy Blosser (emrys)" <jblosser-smgl AT firinn.org>
- Cc: sm-discuss <sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] Better approach to firefox script
- Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 22:19:49 -0700 (PDT)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 10 Aug 2005, Jeremy Blosser (emrys) wrote:
On Aug 10, Eric Sandall [eric AT sandall.us] wrote:
On Wed, 10 Aug 2005, Jason Flatt wrote:
On Wednesday 10 August 2005 09:29 pm, Jeremy Blosser (emrys) wrote:<snip>
Though on further thought, it's probably more inline with the SMGL
philosophy to leave the default alone and let people modify their own
environments if they want this behaviour. I know I hate it when other
distros change the defaults to be "helpful". You could maybe put it in a
new firefox-window script or something instead.
What about YetAnotherConfigureOption to include it or not?
Our firefox script is already non-standard in that I wrote it to fix
some LD_LIBRARY_PATH fun that firefox has.
Non-standard how? Every platform that runs firefox has to deal with the
mozilla library issue, and they all pretty much deal with it that way.
That's the reason used for why you didn't want the script modified as
David Brown suggested...make up your mind (unless I'm misreading)
please. You don't want a distro (even if they 'all' do it to make it
easy) modifying what the package authors intended without good reason.
- -sandalle
- --
Eric Sandall | Source Mage GNU/Linux Developer
eric AT sandall.us | http://www.sourcemage.org/
http://eric.sandall.us/ | SysAdmin @ Inst. Shock Physics @ WSU
http://counter.li.org/ #196285 | http://www.shock.wsu.edu/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFC+t/3HXt9dKjv3WERAhDcAJ9PY1gYA7I4Ya7FXihEs6uBFHuePACglx7G
/ksnKzgQ/rnI8nTZQxOL3CA=
=CRRu
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-
[SM-Discuss] Better approach to firefox script,
David Brown, 08/10/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Better approach to firefox script,
Jeremy Blosser (emrys), 08/11/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Better approach to firefox script,
Jeremy Blosser (emrys), 08/11/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Better approach to firefox script,
Jason Flatt, 08/11/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Better approach to firefox script,
David Brown, 08/11/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Better approach to firefox script, Sergey A. Lipnevich, 08/11/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Better approach to firefox script,
Eric Sandall, 08/11/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Better approach to firefox script,
Jeremy Blosser (emrys), 08/11/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Better approach to firefox script,
Eric Sandall, 08/11/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Better approach to firefox script, Jeremy Blosser (emrys), 08/11/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Better approach to firefox script, Eric Sandall, 08/11/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Better approach to firefox script,
Eric Sandall, 08/11/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Better approach to firefox script,
Jeremy Blosser (emrys), 08/11/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Better approach to firefox script,
David Brown, 08/11/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Better approach to firefox script,
Jason Flatt, 08/11/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Better approach to firefox script, Jeremy Kolb, 08/11/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Better approach to firefox script,
Jeremy Blosser (emrys), 08/11/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Better approach to firefox script,
Jeremy Blosser (emrys), 08/11/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Better approach to firefox script,
Eric Sandall, 08/11/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Better approach to firefox script,
Jeremy Blosser (emrys), 08/11/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Better approach to firefox script, Eric Sandall, 08/11/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Better approach to firefox script,
Jeremy Blosser (emrys), 08/11/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Better approach to firefox script, Eric Sandall, 08/11/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Better approach to firefox script, Jason Flatt, 08/11/2005
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.