sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
Re: [SM-Discuss] detailed QA stable grimoire and ISO proposal
- From: "David C. Haley" <dhaley AT tamsco.com>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] detailed QA stable grimoire and ISO proposal
- Date: Tue, 3 May 2005 14:07:02 +0400
On Mon, 02 May 2005 18:51:15 -0700
Seth Alan Woolley <seth AT positivism.org> wrote:
> === stable grimoire updating process ===
>
> We have three main grimoires, devel, test, and stable:
>
> * devel contains all spells plus works-in-progress, identified by a
> WIP file in them.
>
> * test contains all spells that should work but haven't had gauranteed
> testing. The guru's intent is that, yes, this spell, to the best of
> my knowledge, will work as well as the previous versions. If not,
> it goes in devel with a WIP.
>
> * stable should have been well-tested.
>
<snip>
I have a question about the two minor grimoires that we currently have, eg
Games, and Z-Rejected.
Will this process in any way effect this two grimoires? Having WIP game or
z-rejected spells in devel for example and mograting them to their respective
grimoires when they hit test?
I'm not really making suggestions, as much as I am curious to hear your
opinion on this.
Regards,
SilverS
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] detailed QA stable grimoire and ISO proposal
, (continued)
- Re: [SM-Discuss] detailed QA stable grimoire and ISO proposal, Seth Alan Woolley, 05/03/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] detailed QA stable grimoire and ISO proposal,
Arwed von Merkatz, 05/03/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] detailed QA stable grimoire and ISO proposal,
Seth Alan Woolley, 05/03/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] detailed QA stable grimoire and ISO proposal,
Arwed von Merkatz, 05/03/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] detailed QA stable grimoire and ISO proposal,
Eric Sandall, 05/03/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] detailed QA stable grimoire and ISO proposal,
Arwed von Merkatz, 05/03/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] detailed QA stable grimoire and ISO proposal,
Seth Alan Woolley, 05/03/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] detailed QA stable grimoire and ISO proposal, Arwed von Merkatz, 05/04/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] detailed QA stable grimoire and ISO proposal, Seth Alan Woolley, 05/04/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] detailed QA stable grimoire and ISO proposal,
Seth Alan Woolley, 05/03/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] detailed QA stable grimoire and ISO proposal, Andrew, 05/03/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] detailed QA stable grimoire and ISO proposal,
Arwed von Merkatz, 05/03/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] detailed QA stable grimoire and ISO proposal,
Eric Sandall, 05/03/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] detailed QA stable grimoire and ISO proposal,
Arwed von Merkatz, 05/03/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] detailed QA stable grimoire and ISO proposal,
Seth Alan Woolley, 05/03/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] detailed QA stable grimoire and ISO proposal,
David C. Haley, 05/03/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] detailed QA stable grimoire and ISO proposal,
Seth Alan Woolley, 05/03/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] detailed QA stable grimoire and ISO proposal, Andrew "ruskie" Levstik, 05/03/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] detailed QA stable grimoire and ISO proposal,
Seth Alan Woolley, 05/03/2005
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.