Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

sm-discuss - Re: Updated X.org in devel; was: [SM-Discuss] x86-64 arch specfile not x86-64

sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Eric Sandall <eric AT sandall.us>
  • To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: Re: Updated X.org in devel; was: [SM-Discuss] x86-64 arch specfile not x86-64
  • Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2005 20:44:22 -0700

Quoting "Sergey A. Lipnevich" <sergey AT sourcemage.org>:
> Let's thank x.org guys. They frequently have to choose between
> documentation and working code, so it's good they choose the code :-).
> Eric and Flavien, thanks for the feedback! I'll be pulling xorg into test.

Erm, don't we want it optional, and default off (except for x86_64 maybe,
except
David Brown got xorg compiling fine on his)? This is still marked as "not
finished" on X.org's site. I really like the idea of it, but am leary about
forcing all of our users to use it without much more testing.

-sandalle

--
Eric Sandall | Source Mage GNU/Linux Developer
eric AT sandall.us PGP: 0xA8EFDD61 | http://www.sourcemage.org/
http://eric.sandall.us/ | SysAdmin @ Inst. Shock Physics @ WSU
http://counter.li.org/ #196285 | http://www.shock.wsu.edu/

----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page