sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
Re: Updated X.org in devel; was: [SM-Discuss] x86-64 arch specfile not x86-64
- From: "Sergey A. Lipnevich" <sergey AT optimaltec.com>
- To: Eric Sandall <eric AT sandall.us>
- Cc: SM-Discuss <sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: Updated X.org in devel; was: [SM-Discuss] x86-64 arch specfile not x86-64
- Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 23:14:20 -0400
Module "radeon" Works with my Mobile Radeon 9600 too. Did you mean binary driver here?
Eric Sandall wrote:
Quoting Eric Sandall <eric AT sandall.us>:
<snip>
I've got it compiling for my ati card (xorg radeon driver). Will let you know
how it goes.
Gentoo mentions[0] that neither nVIDIA's nor ATi's binary drivers work with
the
new dllloader, perhaps this information is a bit old as we have a reported
case
of at least nVIDIA's binary driver working.
More information on dllloader can be found in FreeDesktop.Org's bugzilla[1]
and
one of the developers' pages[2].
-sandalle
[0] http://www.gentoo.ro/proj/en/hardened/hardenedxorg.xml
[1] https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=400
[2] http://freedesktop.org/~ajax/dlloader-status.txt
Worked fine here for radeon drivers. :)
I think this should probably be optional as the bug from FreeDesktop.Org
mentions that it's not yet complete.
-
Re: Updated X.org in devel; was: [SM-Discuss] x86-64 arch specfile not x86-64
, (continued)
- Re: Updated X.org in devel; was: [SM-Discuss] x86-64 arch specfile not x86-64, Sergey A. Lipnevich, 04/06/2005
- Re: Updated X.org in devel; was: [SM-Discuss] x86-64 arch specfile not x86-64, Eric Sandall, 04/06/2005
- Re: Updated X.org in devel; was: [SM-Discuss] x86-64 arch specfile not x86-64, Sergey A. Lipnevich, 04/06/2005
- Re: Updated X.org in devel; was: [SM-Discuss] x86-64 arch specfile not x86-64, Eric Sandall, 04/07/2005
- Re: Updated X.org in devel; was: [SM-Discuss] x86-64 arch specfile not x86-64, sergey, 04/07/2005
- Re: Updated X.org in devel; was: [SM-Discuss] x86-64 arch specfile not x86-64, Eric Sandall, 04/07/2005
- Re: Updated X.org in devel; was: [SM-Discuss] x86-64 arch specfile not x86-64, Eric Sandall, 04/07/2005
- Re: Updated X.org in devel; was: [SM-Discuss] x86-64 arch specfile not x86-64, sergey, 04/08/2005
-
Re: Updated X.org in devel; was: [SM-Discuss] x86-64 arch specfile not x86-64,
Eric Sandall, 04/06/2005
- Re: Updated X.org in devel; was: [SM-Discuss] x86-64 arch specfile not x86-64, Sergey A. Lipnevich, 04/06/2005
- Re: Updated X.org in devel; was: [SM-Discuss] x86-64 arch specfile not x86-64, Eric Sandall, 04/06/2005
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.