sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: "David Michael Leo Brown Jr." <dmlb2000 AT excite.com>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: [SM-Discuss] x86-64 arch specfile not x86-64
- Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2005 22:24:20 -0400 (EDT)
I was looking at the x86-64 specfile and was surprised to see that it wasn't
x86-64 the -march flag was set to k8 for gcc 3.4, when it should be x86-64.
I understand that there's some people in sourcemage who have amd64 processors
however, I don't, I have the intel version that uses the x86-64 specifications
(called extended memory 64 technology)
gcc doesn't have em64t as a valid arch spec (not even in v4.1) the closest
thing I
can pass to gcc is x86-64
I would propose a change to the specfiles and move the current x86-64 and
x86-32
to k8-64 and k8-32, and change the x86-64 and x86-32 to the more generic
-march=x86-64, also I would change the x86-[64,32] gcc 3.3 to -march=pentium4
This way would provide arch specs for both amd and intel implementations of
the
arch specification x86-64.
-- David Brown
_______________________________________________
Join Excite! - http://www.excite.com
The most personalized portal on the Web!
-
[SM-Discuss] x86-64 arch specfile not x86-64,
David Michael Leo Brown Jr., 04/04/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] x86-64 arch specfile not x86-64, Andrew, 04/04/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] x86-64 arch specfile not x86-64, David Kowis, 04/05/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] x86-64 arch specfile not x86-64,
Eric Sandall, 04/05/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] x86-64 arch specfile not x86-64, Andrew, 04/05/2005
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] x86-64 arch specfile not x86-64,
David Michael Leo Brown Jr., 04/04/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] x86-64 arch specfile not x86-64, Andrew, 04/04/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] x86-64 arch specfile not x86-64,
David Michael Leo Brown Jr., 04/05/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] x86-64 arch specfile not x86-64, Eric Sandall, 04/05/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] x86-64 arch specfile not x86-64, Benoit PAPILLAULT, 04/05/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] x86-64 arch specfile not x86-64, David Michael Leo Brown Jr., 04/05/2005
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.