sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: Eric Sandall <eric AT sandall.us>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] split gcc spells
- Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2004 09:03:29 -0700
Quoting Arwed von Merkatz <v.merkatz AT gmx.net>:
> Ok, the dummy spells are in, so gurus can start adding dependencies on
> g++, objc, g77 and gcj.
A (hopefully) quick question: Are we to have every (well, not directly, but at
least indirectly) c++ application now depend on g++? Is the only compiler in
basesystem (and hence needing no dependency upon it) gcc?
-sandalle
--
Eric Sandall | Source Mage GNU/Linux Developer
eric AT sandall.us PGP: 0xA8EFDD61 | http://www.sourcemage.org/
http://eric.sandall.us/ | SysAdmin @ Inst. Shock Physics @ WSU
http://counter.li.org/ #196285 | http://www.shock.wsu.edu/
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
-
[SM-Discuss] split gcc spells,
Arwed von Merkatz, 07/06/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] split gcc spells,
Andrew, 07/06/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] split gcc spells, Arwed von Merkatz, 07/06/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] split gcc spells, Eric Sandall, 07/06/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] split gcc spells,
Arwed von Merkatz, 07/06/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] split gcc spells, Arwed von Merkatz, 07/07/2004
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
-
[SM-Discuss] split gcc spells,
Arwed von Merkatz, 07/07/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] split gcc spells,
Arwed von Merkatz, 07/08/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] split gcc spells, Eric Sandall, 07/08/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] split gcc spells,
Eric Sandall, 07/08/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] split gcc spells, Arwed von Merkatz, 07/08/2004
-
[SM-Discuss] Re: split gcc spells,
Treeve Jelbert, 07/08/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Re: split gcc spells, Arwed von Merkatz, 07/08/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] split gcc spells,
Arwed von Merkatz, 07/08/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] split gcc spells,
Andrew, 07/06/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.