sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: Arwed von Merkatz <v.merkatz AT gmx.net>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] split gcc spells
- Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2004 18:17:38 +0200
On Tue, Jul 06, 2004 at 08:59:27AM -0700, Andrew wrote:
> > The way the gcc build system works this makes compilation of all
> > compilers together take a little bit longer than when they were in one
> > spell (expect about a 50% increase in needed time), but I think the
> > added flexibility is worth that. Especially since you only have to cast
> > objc now if you want the Objective-C compiler instead of recompiling the
> > whole compiler collection.
>
> Awesome! Thanks Arwed. Do you have any more info on how long it takes
> to compile each spell (even just relative percentages)?
I can give you rough numbers from my system (athlon 550):
gcc: 1h15m
g++: 1h30m
objc: 1h15m
g77: 1h50m
gcj: 4h15m
Yes, gcj takes *ages*, it has to build C, C++ and java, and the
profiledbootstrap adds two whole compile stages for each compiler.
--
Arwed v. Merkatz Source Mage GNU/Linux developer
http://www.sourcemage.org
-
[SM-Discuss] split gcc spells,
Arwed von Merkatz, 07/06/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] split gcc spells,
Andrew, 07/06/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] split gcc spells, Arwed von Merkatz, 07/06/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] split gcc spells, Eric Sandall, 07/06/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] split gcc spells,
Arwed von Merkatz, 07/06/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] split gcc spells, Arwed von Merkatz, 07/07/2004
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
-
[SM-Discuss] split gcc spells,
Arwed von Merkatz, 07/07/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] split gcc spells,
Arwed von Merkatz, 07/08/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] split gcc spells, Eric Sandall, 07/08/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] split gcc spells,
Eric Sandall, 07/08/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] split gcc spells, Arwed von Merkatz, 07/08/2004
-
[SM-Discuss] Re: split gcc spells,
Treeve Jelbert, 07/08/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Re: split gcc spells, Arwed von Merkatz, 07/08/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] split gcc spells,
Arwed von Merkatz, 07/08/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] split gcc spells,
Andrew, 07/06/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.