sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: Arwed von Merkatz <v.merkatz AT gmx.net>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] split gcc spells
- Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2004 13:50:23 +0200
On Wed, Jul 07, 2004 at 11:08:24PM +0200, Arwed von Merkatz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> just wanted to give a roadmap of how the split spells will be handled.
> I'll create "dummy" spells for g++, g77, gcj and objc in the test and
> stable grimoires. Spells that don't do anything, just existing to
> satisfy a dependency.
> This way we can start adding dependencies on those split spells without
> having to worry about not integrating those changes into test (as it
> happened with some of the libstdc++ depends). The split spells
> themselves will have to wait until we're ready for gcc 3.4.x.
>
> I'll add the dummy spells and remove libg2c, libgcj and libstdc++ spells
> from devel tomorrow, as soon as those are in people can start adding
> dependencies.
Ok, the dummy spells are in, so gurus can start adding dependencies on
g++, objc, g77 and gcj.
--
Arwed v. Merkatz Source Mage GNU/Linux developer
http://www.sourcemage.org
-
[SM-Discuss] split gcc spells,
Arwed von Merkatz, 07/06/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] split gcc spells,
Andrew, 07/06/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] split gcc spells, Arwed von Merkatz, 07/06/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] split gcc spells, Eric Sandall, 07/06/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] split gcc spells,
Arwed von Merkatz, 07/06/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] split gcc spells, Arwed von Merkatz, 07/07/2004
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
-
[SM-Discuss] split gcc spells,
Arwed von Merkatz, 07/07/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] split gcc spells,
Arwed von Merkatz, 07/08/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] split gcc spells, Eric Sandall, 07/08/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] split gcc spells,
Eric Sandall, 07/08/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] split gcc spells, Arwed von Merkatz, 07/08/2004
-
[SM-Discuss] Re: split gcc spells,
Treeve Jelbert, 07/08/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Re: split gcc spells, Arwed von Merkatz, 07/08/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] split gcc spells,
Arwed von Merkatz, 07/08/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] split gcc spells,
Andrew, 07/06/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.