sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: Arwed von Merkatz <v.merkatz AT gmx.net>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] split gcc spells
- Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2004 19:45:43 +0200
On Tue, Jul 06, 2004 at 10:52:26AM +0200, Arwed von Merkatz wrote:
[...]
> Just submitted all of them to devel (except for gcj, needs another test
> cast to finish first). gcc now installs only the C compiler and the gcc
> base stuff, the others (g++, g77, gcj, objc) install their respective
> compilers and runtimes and register themselves with gcc, so it's
> possible (as with a single gcc spell) to run gcc to compile all
> installed languages.
> The way the gcc build system works this makes compilation of all
> compilers together take a little bit longer than when they were in one
> spell (expect about a 50% increase in needed time), but I think the
> added flexibility is worth that. Especially since you only have to cast
> objc now if you want the Objective-C compiler instead of recompiling the
> whole compiler collection.
[...]
Just thought i'd give out a warning, i just noticed that libstdc++
headers are broken. I can compile c++ programs as long as they don't use
the STL, the libstdc++ binary is fine, but compiling c++ stuff that uses
the standard library fails (sometimes, mjpegtools for example works).
I haven't figured out yet why it broke, currently recasting g++ to see
if it makes a difference. It could be caused by the glibc update, gcc
3.4.1 or by the split spells as far as i can tell.
--
Arwed v. Merkatz Source Mage GNU/Linux developer
http://www.sourcemage.org
-
[SM-Discuss] split gcc spells,
Arwed von Merkatz, 07/06/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] split gcc spells,
Andrew, 07/06/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] split gcc spells, Arwed von Merkatz, 07/06/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] split gcc spells, Eric Sandall, 07/06/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] split gcc spells,
Arwed von Merkatz, 07/06/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] split gcc spells, Arwed von Merkatz, 07/07/2004
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
-
[SM-Discuss] split gcc spells,
Arwed von Merkatz, 07/07/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] split gcc spells,
Arwed von Merkatz, 07/08/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] split gcc spells, Eric Sandall, 07/08/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] split gcc spells,
Eric Sandall, 07/08/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] split gcc spells, Arwed von Merkatz, 07/08/2004
-
[SM-Discuss] Re: split gcc spells,
Treeve Jelbert, 07/08/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Re: split gcc spells, Arwed von Merkatz, 07/08/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] split gcc spells,
Arwed von Merkatz, 07/08/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] split gcc spells,
Andrew, 07/06/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.