Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

sm-discuss - Re: [SM-Discuss] Re: split gcc spells

sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Arwed von Merkatz <v.merkatz AT gmx.net>
  • To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] Re: split gcc spells
  • Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2004 19:05:21 +0200

On Thu, Jul 08, 2004 at 06:21:14PM +0200, Treeve Jelbert wrote:
> On Thursday 08 July 2004 13:50, Arwed von Merkatz wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 07, 2004 at 11:08:24PM +0200, Arwed von Merkatz wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > just wanted to give a roadmap of how the split spells will be handled.
> > > I'll create "dummy" spells for g++, g77, gcj and objc in the test and
> > > stable grimoires. Spells that don't do anything, just existing to
> > > satisfy a dependency.
> > > This way we can start adding dependencies on those split spells without
> > > having to worry about not integrating those changes into test (as it
> > > happened with some of the libstdc++ depends). The split spells
> > > themselves will have to wait until we're ready for gcc 3.4.x.
> > >
> > > I'll add the dummy spells and remove libg2c, libgcj and libstdc++ spells
> > > from devel tomorrow, as soon as those are in people can start adding
> > > dependencies.
> > Ok, the dummy spells are in, so gurus can start adding dependencies on
> > g++, objc, g77 and gcj.
>
> any spell which depends on qt-x11 ( all of kde plus some other stuff) can
> be
> fixed by simply changing qt-x11

Doing that right now among other spells.

--
Arwed v. Merkatz Source Mage GNU/Linux developer
http://www.sourcemage.org




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page