sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: Paul <dufflebunk AT dufflebunk.homeip.net>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] rpmunpack in basesystem
- Date: Wed, 19 May 2004 10:10:25 -0400
Sections of the sorcery code use rpmunpack. It expects it to be there,
and if it doesn't find when it needs it, it will start spewing errors.
But if the spells have their dependencies right, this shouldn't be a
problem. I just think is cleaner if everything that sorcery uses
explicitly is in the base system.
On Tue, 2004-18-05 at 19:08 -0700, Eric Sandall wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'd like to propose removing rpmunpack from basesystem and adding it as a
> dependency to any package which uses RPMs.
>
> Thoughts? Any others?
>
> -sandalle
>
> --
> Eric Sandall | Source Mage GNU/Linux Developer
> eric AT sandall.us PGP: 0xA8EFDD61 | http://www.sourcemage.org/
> http://eric.sandall.us/ | SysAdmin @ Inst. Shock Physics @ WSU
> http://counter.li.org/ #196285 | http://www.shock.wsu.edu/
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
> _______________________________________________
> SM-Discuss mailing list
> SM-Discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-discuss
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-
[SM-Discuss] rpmunpack in basesystem,
Eric Sandall, 05/18/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] rpmunpack in basesystem, Seth Alan Woolley, 05/18/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] rpmunpack in basesystem,
Jason Flatt, 05/19/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] rpmunpack in basesystem,
Ladislav Hagara, 05/19/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] rpmunpack in basesystem, Eric Sandall, 05/19/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] rpmunpack in basesystem, Andrew, 05/19/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] rpmunpack in basesystem,
Ladislav Hagara, 05/19/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] rpmunpack in basesystem,
Paul, 05/19/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] rpmunpack in basesystem,
Eric Sandall, 05/19/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] rpmunpack in basesystem,
Paul, 05/19/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] rpmunpack in basesystem,
Eric Sandall, 05/19/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] rpmunpack in basesystem,
Paul, 05/19/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] rpmunpack in basesystem,
Eric Sandall, 05/19/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] rpmunpack in basesystem, Andrew, 05/19/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] rpmunpack in basesystem, Eric Sandall, 05/19/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] rpmunpack in basesystem, Paul, 05/19/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] rpmunpack in basesystem,
Eric Sandall, 05/19/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] rpmunpack in basesystem,
Paul, 05/19/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] rpmunpack in basesystem,
Eric Sandall, 05/19/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] rpmunpack in basesystem,
Paul, 05/19/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] rpmunpack in basesystem,
Eric Sandall, 05/19/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] rpmunpack in basesystem,
Casey Harkins, 05/19/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] rpmunpack in basesystem, Eric Sandall, 05/19/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.