sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: evraire AT tuwg.com
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: RE: Re: [SM-Discuss] Re: The story of
- Date: 19 May 2004 14:10:07 -0000
> Pretty much, yep. Also of note would be if you do force the dispelling of
> Y, and
> X stays (or even if it doesn't), and then something comes along to be cast
> that
> indirectly depends on Y, then Y should be recast, but this would slow things
> down as Sorcery would have to check every direct and indirect dependency.
Along the same lines, if X /optionally/ depends on Y, and you dispel Y it
should not only inform you that X currently depends on it, but that it
optionally does, and if you choose to force Y it should prompt to recompile X
without the optional depends Y.
Isn't this fun? :)
Jonathan Evraire
evraire at tuwg.com
-------------------------------------------------------------
Message sent via http://toad-mail.net
Anti-spam notice, this message originated from IP Address: 69.70.196.119
-------------------------------------------------------------
-
RE: Re: [SM-Discuss] Re: The story of,
evraire, 05/19/2004
- Re: Re: [SM-Discuss] Re: The story of, Andrew, 05/19/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.