sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: Paul <dufflebunk AT dufflebunk.homeip.net>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] rpmunpack in basesystem
- Date: Wed, 19 May 2004 10:43:46 -0400
Cleanness aside, you are correct, everything should be fine.
On Wed, 2004-19-05 at 07:34 -0700, Eric Sandall wrote:
> Quoting Paul <dufflebunk AT dufflebunk.homeip.net>:
> > Sections of the sorcery code use rpmunpack. It expects it to be there,
> > and if it doesn't find when it needs it, it will start spewing errors.
> > But if the spells have their dependencies right, this shouldn't be a
> > problem. I just think is cleaner if everything that sorcery uses
> > explicitly is in the base system.
>
> I like having a system with only what /I/ use on it, and I'm sure others do
> as
> well. rpmunpack is probably hardly ever used, though it doesn't take up much
> space, it's still an extra that most don't need (along with cpio). Doesn't
> Sorcery only try to use rpmunpack on packages that use RPMs (that's why
> you're
> saying it should be safe, yes?)? If so, then I'll go ahead and do this
> today if
> there aren't any technical problems with it.
>
> -sandalle
>
> --
> Eric Sandall | Source Mage GNU/Linux Developer
> eric AT sandall.us PGP: 0xA8EFDD61 | http://www.sourcemage.org/
> http://eric.sandall.us/ | SysAdmin @ Inst. Shock Physics @ WSU
> http://counter.li.org/ #196285 | http://www.shock.wsu.edu/
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
> _______________________________________________
> SM-Discuss mailing list
> SM-Discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-discuss
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-
[SM-Discuss] rpmunpack in basesystem,
Eric Sandall, 05/18/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] rpmunpack in basesystem, Seth Alan Woolley, 05/18/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] rpmunpack in basesystem,
Jason Flatt, 05/19/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] rpmunpack in basesystem,
Ladislav Hagara, 05/19/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] rpmunpack in basesystem, Eric Sandall, 05/19/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] rpmunpack in basesystem, Andrew, 05/19/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] rpmunpack in basesystem,
Ladislav Hagara, 05/19/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] rpmunpack in basesystem,
Paul, 05/19/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] rpmunpack in basesystem,
Eric Sandall, 05/19/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] rpmunpack in basesystem,
Paul, 05/19/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] rpmunpack in basesystem,
Eric Sandall, 05/19/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] rpmunpack in basesystem,
Paul, 05/19/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] rpmunpack in basesystem,
Eric Sandall, 05/19/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] rpmunpack in basesystem, Andrew, 05/19/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] rpmunpack in basesystem, Eric Sandall, 05/19/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] rpmunpack in basesystem, Paul, 05/19/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] rpmunpack in basesystem,
Eric Sandall, 05/19/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] rpmunpack in basesystem,
Paul, 05/19/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] rpmunpack in basesystem,
Eric Sandall, 05/19/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] rpmunpack in basesystem,
Paul, 05/19/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] rpmunpack in basesystem,
Eric Sandall, 05/19/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] rpmunpack in basesystem,
Casey Harkins, 05/19/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] rpmunpack in basesystem,
Eric Sandall, 05/19/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] rpmunpack in basesystem, Andrew, 05/19/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] rpmunpack in basesystem,
Eric Sandall, 05/19/2004
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- RE: [SM-Discuss] rpmunpack in basesystem, evraire, 05/19/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.