Public SourceMage Discussion List

[Paul <dufflebunk AT dufflebunk.homeip.net>]

Have you tried gaze orphans?

On Tue, 2004-18-05 at 16:41 +0000, Mathieu L wrote:
> > > Hey guys,
> > > 
> > > We should probably discuss possible solutions to Bug #5957[0]. ;)
> > > 
> > > -sandalle
> > > 
> > > [0] http://bugs.sourcemage.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5957
> >  
> > 1. indirect dependencies should be relied on, otherwise every single
> >    gnome program would have a list of 30+ dependencies, which just isn't
> >    manageable. (I thought we agreed on that before, otherwise we're
> >    missing about a thousand dependencies on X11-LIBS ;)
> > 2. having dispel refuse to dispel spells that others depend on sounds
> >    like a good solution, with a switch --force to override that
> >    behaviour
> > 
> > -- 
> > Arwed v. Merkatz                              Source Mage GNU/Linux 
> > developer
> >                                                     
> > http://www.sourcemage.org
> > 
> In the same kind of idea is it planned (is it at least feasable?) to do 
> something like:
> I want to cast X.
> Y is also casted because X depends on Y.
> I don't want X anymore so I dispell it.
> -->dispel offers me to dispell Y as well because it's no longer needed by 
> any spell.
> 
> I would find this useful because it often happens that I cast something 
> which depends on a lot of other stuff just to see if I like it; but I 
> usually dispel it afterwards and since I don't want my system to be bloated 
> by lots of unused stuff, I have to dispell one by one all the previous 
> dependencies.
> 
> /Lejatorn.
> ------------------------------------------------
> We are Microsoft.  Linux is irrelevant.
> Openness is futile.  Prepare to be assimilated.
> ------------------------------------------------
> 
> -- 
> ______________________________________________
> Check out the latest SMS services @ http://www.linuxmail.org 
> This allows you to send and receive SMS through your mailbox.
> 
> 
> Powered by Outblaze
> _______________________________________________
> SM-Discuss mailing list
> SM-Discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-discuss

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part