Public SourceMage Discussion List

[Jason Flatt <jason AT flattfamily.com>]

On Tuesday 16 September 2003 07:44 am, Eric Sandall wrote:
> Quoting Hamish Greig <hgreig AT bigpond.net.au>:
> > Some people on IRC commented I am too longwinded.
> > Here is a paraphrase.
> > Two grimoires is working fantastically there is NO reason to go back.
> > In fact, "devel" repository should only hold spells that actually differ
> > from test and shouldn't be a complete grimoire.
>
> <snip>
>
> What do people think about this?  I kind of like the idea of reducing the
> size of the devel grimoire to only what's different, and then we only have
> to update test instead both devel /and/ test, reduce our workload by a
> little bit (p4 integ isn't much work, but it adds up).
>
> Thoughts?  (Note, this fork of the thread is for this subject only, not for
> whether or not we should put the devel tarball back).
>
> -sandalle


Woo, hoo!  At last!  I was all for this when the devel tarball got dropped.


-- 
Jason Flatt (jason @ flattfamily . com)
Father of five (http://www.flattfamily.com/)
Linux user (http://www.sourcemage.org/)
IRC Nick: Oadae  Channels: #sourcemage, #lvlug  Server: irc.freenode.net
PGP Key: E992213F - 0254 9DB7 BE0E 312D 8352 6E39 0700 FB95 E992 213F