Public SourceMage Discussion List

[Eric Sandall <eric AT sandall.us>]

Quoting Hamish Greig <hgreig AT bigpond.net.au>:
> Some people on IRC commented I am too longwinded.
> Here is a paraphrase.
> Two grimoires is working fantastically there is NO reason to go back.
> In fact, "devel" repository should only hold spells that actually differ 
> from 
> test and shouldn't be a complete grimoire.
<snip>

What do people think about this?  I kind of like the idea of reducing the size
of the devel grimoire to only what's different, and then we only have to 
update
test instead both devel /and/ test, reduce our workload by a little bit (p4
integ isn't much work, but it adds up).

Thoughts?  (Note, this fork of the thread is for this subject only, not for
whether or not we should put the devel tarball back).

-sandalle

-- 
PGP Key Fingerprint:  FCFF 26A1 BE21 08F4 BB91  FAED 1D7B 7D74 A8EF DD61
http://search.keyserver.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xA8EFDD61

-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.12
GCS/E/IT$ d-- s++:+>: a-- C++(+++) BL++++VIS>$ P+(++) L+++ E-(---) W++ N+@ o?
K? w++++>-- O M-@ V-- PS+(+++) PE(-) Y++(+) PGP++(+) t+() 5++ X(+) R+(++)
tv(--)b++(+++) DI+@ D++(+++) G>+++ e>+++ h---(++) r++ y+
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------

Eric Sandall                     |  Source Mage GNU/Linux Developer
eric AT sandall.us                  |  http://www.sourcemage.org/
http://eric.sandall.us/          |  SysAdmin @ Inst. Shock Physics @ WSU
http://counter.li.org/  #196285  |  http://www.shock.wsu.edu/

-------------------------------------------------
This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/