Public SourceMage Discussion List

[Geoffrey Derber <Geoffrey.Derber AT Trinity.edu>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

I took that to mean we could package the sorcery scripts and only the
sorcery scripts anyway we want, but everything else has to be rpm format.

Geoff

Jeremy Kolb wrote:
| At the bottom though is this:
|
| "The distribution itself may use a different packaging format for its
| own packages, and of course it may use any available mechanism for
| installing the LSB-conformant packages."
|
| doesn't that mean that we can install our packages anyway we want
| (source code), but we have to provide a way to handle rpms as well?
|
| Jeremy
|
|
| Geoffrey Derber wrote:
|
|>
|> http://www.linuxbase.org/spec/refspecs/LSB_1.2.0/gLSB/swinstall.html
|>
|> I think this kills off any possibility that we will ever be able to be
|> completely LSB compliant to be able to recieve certification.
|>
|> "Applications should be provided in the RPM packaging format as defined
|> in the appendix of the 1997 edition of Maximum RPM, with some
|> restrictions listed below."
|>
|> Geoff
|> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
|> Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (GNU/Linux)
|> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
|>
|> iD8DBQE9tzSgHBxk9YxVu58RAho/AJ9Y6cX6pt8UiEChZ3RY4sCTX/1Q4QCgian4
|> ElSGl7rJbyvI3Bhb/S2DWaA=
|> =+A9D
|> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
|>
|> _______________________________________________
|> SM-Discuss mailing list
|> SM-Discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
|> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-discuss
|
|
|
|
|
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQE9tzdoHBxk9YxVu58RAg7YAJ0Rk76cSmhHjmseh3tTFdI4CNRSxgCg7hfJ
pS2KtPBIYidodiy3Jhc5mvE=
=xsqr
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----