Public SourceMage Discussion List

[Geoffrey Derber <Geoffrey.Derber AT Trinity.edu>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Eric Sandall wrote:
| Should we or can we [even] apply for LSB 1.2 Certification?  I've noticed
| that only commercial distros (RH, Mandrake, SuSe) have certified on the
| following site, but should we also?  Are we going for LSB compliance along
| with FHS compliance?
|
| http://www.opengroup.org/lsb/cert/cert_prodlist.tpl
|
| -One of Four
| a.k.a. sandalle
|

http://www.linuxbase.org/spec/refspecs/LSB_1.2.0/gLSB/swinstall.html

I think this kills off any possibility that we will ever be able to be
completely LSB compliant to be able to recieve certification.

"Applications should be provided in the RPM packaging format as defined
in the appendix of the 1997 edition of Maximum RPM, with some
restrictions listed below."

Geoff
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQE9tzSgHBxk9YxVu58RAho/AJ9Y6cX6pt8UiEChZ3RY4sCTX/1Q4QCgian4
ElSGl7rJbyvI3Bhb/S2DWaA=
=+A9D
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----