Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

sm-discuss - Re: [SM-Discuss] LSB (1.2) Certification

sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Geoffrey Derber <Geoffrey.Derber AT Trinity.edu>
  • To: eric AT sandall.us
  • Cc: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] LSB (1.2) Certification
  • Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 19:23:10 -0500

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1



Eric Sandall wrote:
| Reapl Paratorn said:
|
|>That is how I read it as well. As long as we provide some way of
|>installing rpms compatible with the standard they mention then we can
|>still install anything else in any way we want.
|>
|>Now I have no knowledge of rpms so I have no idea of how hard it would
|>be to do, but really I don't see it as that important. Use their work to
|>get applications and distros to standardise to something and our job is
|>all the more easier.
|>
|>My 2 cents worth.
|>
|>Reapl
|>
|>ps. See this is what you get when I get left home sick and waiting for
|>machines to reinstall......
|
|
| That's my impression as well, and I was working on an 'alien' spell so
| that we could get RPMs to work, but it didn't pan out. :( Maybe I'll try
| again...
|
| -One of Four
| a.k.a. sandalle
|

I guess I'm the only one who interpreted it as meaning that we could
package sorcery and sorcery only in any format we wanted and that the
rest had to be rpms. I wonder what they really mean by that.

Geoff
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQE9tz1tHBxk9YxVu58RAhl9AKDIIclaf0tPVyKeenTrgo34XkIUzACgqYMn
NFChLQWy417T5cJidT6nZ/c=
=lTgW
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page