sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List

List archive

[SM-Discuss] LSB (1.2) Certification

From: "Eric Sandall" <eric AT sandall.us>
To: " Source Mage - Discuss" <sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org>
Subject: [SM-Discuss] LSB (1.2) Certification
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 16:29:32 -0700 (PDT)

Should we or can we [even] apply for LSB 1.2 Certification? I've noticed
that only commercial distros (RH, Mandrake, SuSe) have certified on the
following site, but should we also? Are we going for LSB compliance along
with FHS compliance?

http://www.opengroup.org/lsb/cert/cert_prodlist.tpl

-One of Four
a.k.a. sandalle

--
PGP Key 0x5C8D199A5A317214
Fingerprint=14C0 C194 163E 57CB 0F1B ED87 5C8D 199A 5A31 7214

Eric Sandall | Source Mage GNU/Linux
Developer
eric AT sandall.us | http://www.sourcemage.org
http://www.sandall.us/~sandalle | SysAdmin @ Inst. Shock Physics @ WSU
http://counter.li.org #196285 | http://www.shock.wsu.edu/

[SM-Discuss] LSB (1.2) Certification, Eric Sandall, 10/23/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] LSB (1.2) Certification, Sergey A Lipnevich, 10/23/2002
  - Re: [SM-Discuss] LSB (1.2) Certification, Ryan Abrams, 10/23/2002
    - Re: [SM-Discuss] LSB (1.2) Certification, Sergey A Lipnevich, 10/23/2002
    - Re: [SM-Discuss] LSB (1.2) Certification, Julian v. Bock, 10/24/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] LSB (1.2) Certification, Geoffrey Derber, 10/23/2002
  - Re: [SM-Discuss] LSB (1.2) Certification, Jeremy Kolb, 10/23/2002
    - Re: [SM-Discuss] LSB (1.2) Certification, Geoffrey Derber, 10/23/2002
    - RE: [SM-Discuss] LSB (1.2) Certification, Reapl Paratorn, 10/23/2002
      - RE: [SM-Discuss] LSB (1.2) Certification, Eric Sandall, 10/23/2002
        
        Re: [SM-Discuss] LSB (1.2) Certification, Jeremy Kolb, 10/23/2002