Public SourceMage Discussion List

[Jeremy Kolb <jkolb AT brandeis.edu>]

At the bottom though is this:

"The distribution itself may use a different packaging format for its 
own packages, and of course it may use any available mechanism for 
installing the LSB-conformant packages."

doesn't that mean that we can install our packages anyway we want 
(source code), but we have to provide a way to handle rpms as well?

Jeremy


Geoffrey Derber wrote:

> http://www.linuxbase.org/spec/refspecs/LSB_1.2.0/gLSB/swinstall.html
>
> I think this kills off any possibility that we will ever be able to be
> completely LSB compliant to be able to recieve certification.
>
> "Applications should be provided in the RPM packaging format as defined
> in the appendix of the 1997 edition of Maximum RPM, with some
> restrictions listed below."
>
> Geoff
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
>
> iD8DBQE9tzSgHBxk9YxVu58RAho/AJ9Y6cX6pt8UiEChZ3RY4sCTX/1Q4QCgian4
> ElSGl7rJbyvI3Bhb/S2DWaA=
> =+A9D
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> _______________________________________________
> SM-Discuss mailing list
> SM-Discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-discuss