sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: Adam Clark <adamsgl AT dhbit.ca>
- To: julian AT openit.de (Julian v. Bock)
- Cc: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] For 1.0 release a question?
- Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2002 10:02:41 -0700
Hey Julian,
The entire base system compiles and works cleanly under GCC 3.2. The 1001
ISO is an example of that. (Of course, you may not know about the 1001
ISO... but believe me, it exists. =)
On Fri, 11 Oct 2002 15:21:07 +0200
julian AT openit.de (Julian v. Bock) wrote:
> Hi
>
> >>>>> "AvM" == Arwed von Merkatz <v.merkatz AT gmx.net> writes:
>
> AvM> On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 03:03:28PM +0200, Eric Schabell wrote:
> >> Howdy all!
> >>
> >> Just a note to see what the official line is, but we are going to
> >> have a gcc3.2 compatible grimoire right? No gcc2 spells?
>
> AvM> There seem to still be a lot of spells in the devel grimoire with
> AvM> USEGCC2 files, so that could be a problem. How about removing
> AvM> the dependency on gcc2 in gcc and just have all spells that need
> AvM> gcc2 to compile have a dependency on it? That way the system
> AvM> would be gcc3, only if someone needs a spell that will only
> AvM> compile with gcc2 it will be installed.
>
> This should work since ncurses does not need gcc2 anymore.
> We should double-check the base system though.
>
> Julian
> _______________________________________________
> SM-Discuss mailing list
> SM-Discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-discuss
--
Adam Clark, Chat Section Maintainer, ISO Forger
Grimoire Gurus Cardholding Member
a.k.a. Kinetix on #sourcemage, #grimoire-gurus
http://grimoire-gurus.org
Attachment:
pgp5KYG_1J4R9.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-
[SM-Discuss] For 1.0 release a question?,
Eric Schabell, 10/11/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] For 1.0 release a question?,
Arwed von Merkatz, 10/11/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] For 1.0 release a question?,
Julian v. Bock, 10/11/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] For 1.0 release a question?,
Eric Schabell, 10/11/2002
- [SM-Discuss] a question on z-rejected, Jonathan Evraire, 10/11/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] For 1.0 release a question?,
Tony Smith, 10/11/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] For 1.0 release a question?,
Eric Schabell, 10/11/2002
- RE: [SM-Discuss] For 1.0 release a question?, Reapl Paratorn, 10/11/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] For 1.0 release a question?,
Eric Schabell, 10/11/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] For 1.0 release a question?, Adam Clark, 10/11/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] For 1.0 release a question?,
Eric Schabell, 10/11/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] For 1.0 release a question?,
Julian v. Bock, 10/11/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] For 1.0 release a question?,
Arwed von Merkatz, 10/11/2002
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.