sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List

List archive

Re: [SM-Discuss] For 1.0 release a question?

From: Tony Smith <tony AT smee.org>
To: eschabell AT sourcemage.org
Cc: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org, sm-grimoire AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] For 1.0 release a question?
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2002 15:13:55 +0100

On Friday 11 October 2002 2:53 pm, Eric Schabell wrote:
> and gcc2 spell can also go to z-rejected.

I disagree with this point - why should it go in z-rejected? There are no
licensing issues - just keep it in devel as an optional spell that people can
cast or not as they want without having to respond to the prompts you get
with a rejected spell.

Tony

[SM-Discuss] For 1.0 release a question?, Eric Schabell, 10/11/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] For 1.0 release a question?, Arwed von Merkatz, 10/11/2002
  - Re: [SM-Discuss] For 1.0 release a question?, Julian v. Bock, 10/11/2002
    - Re: [SM-Discuss] For 1.0 release a question?, Eric Schabell, 10/11/2002
      - [SM-Discuss] a question on z-rejected, Jonathan Evraire, 10/11/2002
      - Re: [SM-Discuss] For 1.0 release a question?, Tony Smith, 10/11/2002
        
        Re: [SM-Discuss] For 1.0 release a question?, Eric Schabell, 10/11/2002
        
        RE: [SM-Discuss] For 1.0 release a question?, Reapl Paratorn, 10/11/2002
    - Re: [SM-Discuss] For 1.0 release a question?, Adam Clark, 10/11/2002