Public SourceMage Discussion List

[Eric Schabell <eschabell AT sourcemage.org>]

> On Friday October 11 2002 16:13, you wrote:
> On Friday 11 October 2002 2:53 pm, Eric Schabell wrote:
> > and gcc2 spell can also go to z-rejected.
>
> I disagree with this point - why should it go in z-rejected? There are no
> licensing issues - just keep it in devel as an optional spell that people
> can cast or not as they want without having to respond to the prompts you
> get with a rejected spell.
>
Agreed... was just thinking out loud... seems better to keep devel with all 
that sort of thing and phase them out as the developers get their act 
together and migrate to a modern compiler! ;-)

-- 
/*
 * drs. Eric Schabell
 *  web: http://www.schabell.com
 *  SourceMage: http://www.sourcemage.org
 *  Shopping: http://www.cafeshops.com/cp/store.aspx?s=sourcemage.0
 *  irc.openprojects.org (#sourcemage)
 *  nick -> erics
 */