sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: Arwed von Merkatz <v.merkatz AT gmx.net>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] For 1.0 release a question?
- Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2002 15:10:44 +0200
On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 03:03:28PM +0200, Eric Schabell wrote:
> Howdy all!
>
> Just a note to see what the official line is, but we are going to have a
> gcc3.2 compatible grimoire right? No gcc2 spells?
There seem to still be a lot of spells in the devel grimoire with
USEGCC2 files, so that could be a problem.
How about removing the dependency on gcc2 in gcc and just have all
spells that need gcc2 to compile have a dependency on it? That way the
system would be gcc3, only if someone needs a spell that will only
compile with gcc2 it will be installed.
--
Arwed
aka alley_cat
-
[SM-Discuss] For 1.0 release a question?,
Eric Schabell, 10/11/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] For 1.0 release a question?,
Arwed von Merkatz, 10/11/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] For 1.0 release a question?,
Julian v. Bock, 10/11/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] For 1.0 release a question?,
Eric Schabell, 10/11/2002
- [SM-Discuss] a question on z-rejected, Jonathan Evraire, 10/11/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] For 1.0 release a question?,
Tony Smith, 10/11/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] For 1.0 release a question?,
Eric Schabell, 10/11/2002
- RE: [SM-Discuss] For 1.0 release a question?, Reapl Paratorn, 10/11/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] For 1.0 release a question?,
Eric Schabell, 10/11/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] For 1.0 release a question?, Adam Clark, 10/11/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] For 1.0 release a question?,
Eric Schabell, 10/11/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] For 1.0 release a question?,
Julian v. Bock, 10/11/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] For 1.0 release a question?,
Arwed von Merkatz, 10/11/2002
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.